How Does Stepping on a Hose Affect Water Flow and Speed?

AI Thread Summary
Stepping on a garden hose significantly reduces its internal diameter, which affects water flow and speed. Initially, the water flow rate was calculated to be 8.59 m³/s, but this figure is questioned as unrealistic for a standard hose. After stepping on it, the calculated speed of water was mistakenly determined to be 486 m/s, which is implausible and exceeds sound speed. The continuity equation indicates that as the cross-sectional area decreases, the water speed should increase, not decrease. Overall, the calculations need correction to align with the principles of fluid dynamics.
jdg
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Next question: A garden hose with internal diameter of 13.5 mm lies flat on a sidewalk while water is flowing in it at a speed of 6 m/s. A person happens to step on it at the very edge of the opening of the hose and decreases its internal diameter by a factor of 9

So D (1) = 0.0135m
r (1) = 0.00675m
D (2) = 0.0135/9 = 0.0015m
r (2) = 0.00075m
A (1) = pi*r^2 = (3.14...)(0.00675^2) = 1.4134...e-4
A (2) = pi*r^2 = (3.14...)(0.00075^2) = 1.767...e-6

1. What was the water flow rate in the hose prior to the person stepping on it?
- I got this part: J(1) = A(1)V(1) = 8.59 m3/s

2. What is the flow rate of water after the person steps on it?
part 2 I did J = A(1)V(1) = A(2)V(2):

So V2 = V1*(A1/A2) = 486 m/s

Is this right? 3. What is the speed of the water just as it exits the hose after the person steps on it?

And for part 3 I did

J = (A2)(V2) = 8.59e-4 m3/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdg said:
- I got this part: J(1) = A(1)V(1) = 8.59 m3/s
You didn't get this part. 8.59 m3/s is about 2200 gallons a second. Do you really believe that a 1/2-inch diameter hose can put out that much water?

jdg said:
Is this right?
It can't be right. A speed of 486 m/s is almost Mach 1.5.

It looks like you messed up your powers of 10. You also don't understand the continuity equation. When the person steps on the hose, the speed should increase, not decrease because if the area becomes smaller, the speed must increase to keep the product ##Av## constant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top