How Does Surface Tension Relate to Maxwell Relations?

mkbh_10
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Discuss the variation of force of surface tension with the help of maxwell relations ?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It is a question from previous year question paper , my exams are going so i am asking for little help as i don't know how to connect the two as the books that i have don't mention it anywhere
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do this by writing the first law in differential form

dU=T\,dS-p\,dV+\mu\,dN

and adding a term for surface energy to let you set up Maxwell relations.
 
i am still not getting it ?
 
Surface tension adds an additional energy term \gamma\,dA where \gamma is the surface energy and A is the area.

Maxwell relations arise because the equation I wrote above is really

dU=\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial S}\right)_{V,N,A}dS+\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_{S,N,A}dV+\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial N}\right)_{S,V,A}dN+\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial A}\right)_{S,V,N}dA

and we've assigned the variables T, -p, \mu, and \gamma to the partial derivatives. Therefore

\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial V}\right)=\left(\frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial S\,\partial V}\right)=\left(\frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial V\,\partial S}\right)=-\left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial S}\right)

You should be able to apply the same reasoning to differentials involving \gamma.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top