How does symmetry affect the shell theorem?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shell Symmetry Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Gauss' shell theorem asserts that a uniformly charged spherical shell produces a net electric field of zero inside the shell. However, if the charge distribution is non-uniform, the electric field inside the shell is not zero. The discussion confirms that the lack of spherical symmetry due to non-uniform charge distribution prevents the application of Gauss' law to conclude a zero electric field. The principle of superposition demonstrates that the electric field can be non-zero due to localized charge variations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' law and its applications
  • Familiarity with electric fields and charge distributions
  • Knowledge of the principle of superposition in electrostatics
  • Basic concepts of spherical symmetry in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of non-uniform charge distributions on electric fields
  • Explore advanced applications of Gauss' law in electrostatics
  • Investigate the principle of superposition in various electrostatic scenarios
  • Review case studies involving spherical symmetry and electric field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals in electrostatics or electrical engineering seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and charge distributions.

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Gauss' shell theorem states that if given a spherical shell of charge such that the charge is uniformly distributed on the surface, the net electric field anywhere inside the sphere is zero.

But I'm wondering (and turns out this was on a past exam), what happens if the charge is not uniformly distributed?

Will the field anywhere and everywhere inside the shell STILL be 0?

My hypothesis is that it cannot be 0 everywhere, since even though Gauss' law can be used to prove that the flux is zero, spherical symmetry cannot be used to take the E vector out of the loop integral since there is no uniform charge distribution.

My other explanation was that 0 field everywhere inside would necessarily imply a uniform charge distribution which is against the framework of the question...

Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's non-zero. You can prove it by superposition: Suppose the charge is distributed uniformly everywhere except at a point. Then the field is the sum of a uniform field (i.e., zero inside the sphere) and the excess field at the point (non-zero everywhere).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K