How Does Tension Affect Electric Charge Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of electric charge using Coulomb's Law, where the user initially misapplied the arcsine function instead of the sine function to determine the distance between two charges. They correctly identified the forces acting on the system, including tension, weight, and electrical force, and aimed to find the x-component of the electrical force for further calculations. The user derived the tension in the rope and subsequently used it to find the charge, but their final result was incorrect due to the initial miscalculation of the distance. The key error was in using arcsin(4) instead of sin(4) to calculate the distance, which affected the subsequent calculations. Correcting this mistake is essential for obtaining the accurate charge value.
verd
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I thought I did this correctly and my answer turned out incorrect. Here's the problem:

http://synthdriven.com/images/deletable/help.jpg"

This is what I did:

In order to use Coloumb's Law, I need r, the distance between the two charges.

\arcsin{4}=\frac{x}{0.24m}
x=0.24\arcsin{4}=0.098m
r=2x=0.196m

So that's r.

Then I need to pick one side of this thing apart and break it down into x and y-components.

With the weight, I have three forces acting on this thing. The tension in the rope, the weight, and the electrical force repelling each sphere.

My goal is to find the x-component of the electrical force so I can then plug it into Coulomb's law and find the charge.

For the weight,
Wx=0
Wy=-mg=-0.98

For the tension,
Tx=-Tsin4
Ty=Tcos4

For the electrical force,
Fx=Tsin4
Fy=0

To find T, all I did was:

FyNET=Wy+Ty+Fy=Tcos4-mg
(net force of y-component)

T=mg/cos4
Right??

So for T, I get 0.098239

Plugging that into Tx, I get 0.006853And then it goes into Coulomb's law. Which I have reformatted this way:

F=\frac{kq^2}{r^2}

...Because both charges are supposed to be equal... Moving that around, I get:
q=\sqrt{\frac{Fr^2}{k}}

Plugging in values, I got 1.711e-7What did I do wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
verd said:
This is what I did:

In order to use Coloumb's Law, I need r, the distance between the two charges.

\arcsin{4}=\frac{x}{0.24m}
x=0.24\arcsin{4}=0.098m
r=2x=0.196m

So that's r.
That first equation should have sin(4), not arcsin(4).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top