How Does Tension Affect Guitar String Frequency Beyond Basic Equations?

IsaacsA
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
I am currently conducting an investigation into the way in which frequency varies when you change the tension on a guitar string.
I am aware of Mersenne's laws, and that frequency should vary in square root proportion to tension. I'm looking for an explanation that goes beyond simply the formulae regarding the relationship, perhaps on a more microscopic scale.
In any case, I've searched a number of resources and I haven't been able to discern any reasonable explanation beyond the equation that exists.
Does anyone know of why frequency varies in square root proportion to tension, beyond simply the equation?

Mersenne's equation no. 22:

f(1)=v/λ=[1/(2L)](T/μ)^1/2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you already know about vibrations?

The equation is easy to derive from Newton's laws of motion (Google will find lots of references ), once you know calculus and partial differential equations, but I guess from the question that you don't know that much math.

Do you know about simple harmonic motion, and the vibration of a mass on a spring?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top