How Does the Angle Theta Affect Frictional Force in a Mop Sliding Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the angle theta of a mop handle and the frictional force required to slide the mop across the floor. For part a, the force F needed to maintain uniform velocity is calculated as |F| = MuK * mg / (sin(theta) - MuK * cos(theta)). In part b, it is established that if theta is less than a critical angle theta0, the mop cannot slide regardless of the applied force, with theta0 defined as Tan-1(MuS). The conversation highlights the challenge of incorporating the normal force's mass component and suggests that under certain conditions, this component can be neglected to simplify the problem. Ultimately, the critical angle theta0 remains consistent for any mop with the same coefficient of static friction.
WarpDrive
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The handle of a floor mop of mass m makes an angle theta with the vertical direction. Let muK be the coefficient of kinetic friction between the mop and the floor and muS be the coefficient of static friction. Neglect the mass of the handle.

a) Find the magnitude of the force F directed along the handle required to slide the mop with uniform velocity across the floor

b) Show that if theta is smaller than a certain angle theta0, the mop cannot be made to slide across the flor no matter how great a force is directed along the handle. What is the angle theta0?

Answers:

So far, I have been able to get a. It's an odd question, so the answers are there in the back of the book. I got the answer for part a:
|F| = MuK *mg / (sin(theta) - MuK *cos(theta))

But I'm still stuck on B. I know that the horizontal component of the force F must be smaller than friction, so |F|sin(theta0) < MuS(mg+|F|cos(theta0).

Now, the answer in the back of the book is simply Tan-1(MuS). But the extra MuS*mg is getting in the way. The only solution I see is the claim that because |F|sin(theta0) is so much larger than MuS*m*g, that the mg part of the normal force can be ignored. This allows you to simplify the problem to the answer, but is this right? It seems odd to simply get rid of one of the components.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of it this way: As long as the angle of the mop handle is less than \theta_0, where \tan \theta_0 = \mu, the mop won't slide regardless of its mass. Thus that angle works for any mop with the same \mu. (Of course, as you realize, if you know the mass you can increase that angle a bit.)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top