How Does the Cloud Profiling Radar Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter toam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
AI Thread Summary
Cloud Profiling Radar is a space science instrument used primarily for meteorological purposes, focusing on cloud structure and properties. The discussion highlights the need for clarification on the radar's properties and how they relate to physics for a class assignment. Participants suggest that the original poster specify which properties are confusing to facilitate better explanations. There is also a note questioning the appropriateness of the instrument for the assignment's space science focus. Understanding the radar's functionality is essential for completing the report effectively.
toam
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
For a class I'm doing I have an assignment where we have to do a report on a Space Science Instrument.

I am doing Cloud Profiling Radar.

Part of the report has to involve some calculations which basically just apply out knowledge of physics to the properties of the instrument.

The trouble is I don't really understand what some of the properties mean, and how the radar actually works.

The properties I have are listed here: http://cloudsat.atmos.colostate.edu/instrument/instrument.html

If anyone could explain some of these properties to me, that would be great.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
toam said:
For a class I'm doing I have an assignment where we have to do a report on a Space Science Instrument.

I am doing Cloud Profiling Radar.

Has this choice been approved by your teacher? Although it's satellite-based, the key science goals seem to be meteorological, not space-related.


If anyone could explain some of these properties to me, that would be great.

There's a lot there to be explained. Perhaps you could be more specific.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
664
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top