How Does the Gravitational Force Equation Change with 1/r^3?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the gravitational force equation, emphasizing the transition from the conventional inverse-square law (F = Gm1m2/r^2) to a vector form that incorporates a 1/r^3 term. This adjustment arises when calculating the force vector between two mass points, where the distance r is defined as the Euclidean distance between their coordinates. The force vector is expressed as F = -G(m1m2/|p1 - p2|^3)(p1 - p2), which maintains the inverse-square relationship while normalizing the direction of the force. The additional r^3 factor is necessary for proper vector normalization. This approach, while unconventional, aligns with the principles of gravitational interaction in a vector context.
nearc
Gold Member
Messages
65
Reaction score
6
apologies if this has been covered elsewhere in the forums, but i was unable to find it. I've seen the usual gravitational force equation [i.e. F=gMm/r^2] with essentially r^3 in the bottom. an example of this can be seen in http://www.mathworks.com/moler/exm/chapters/orbits.pdf on pages 8 and 9.

i'm looking for any info [paper/webpages] that might explain how to use this approach, thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
it's a vector equation and the author (who happens to be the guy who created the first MATLAB) is not being conventional with his math symbols.

Newtons gravitational law can first be stated:

F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}

where F is the magnitude of the force vector that runs along the line that connects m_1 and m_2. and r is the Euclidian distance between them. this is a scaler equation and is the simple inverse-square gravitational equation you see most everywhere.

now suppose that the body with mass m_1 is located at point \vec{p_1} and the body with mass m_2 is located at point \vec{p_2}. the coordinates of the points are

\vec{p_1} = ( \ x_1, \ y_1, \ z_1 \ )

\vec{p_2} = ( \ x_2, \ y_2, \ z_2 \ )

the distance between the two points \vec{p_2} and \vec{p_1} is

r = | \vec{p_1} - \vec{p_2} | = \sqrt{(x_1-x_2)^2 +(y_1-y_2)^2 +(z_1-z_2)^2 }

now, the difference vector that connects \vec{p_2} to \vec{p_1} is \vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}, so r is just the magnitude of that difference vector.

lastly to get a force vector \vec{F} that has magnitude F, we need to create a unit vector that runs along the line that connects \vec{p_2} to \vec{p_1}. that unit vector is the difference vector \vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2} normalized by dividing by its length r=|\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}|. this is where the extra power in r^3 comes from.

so the force acting on the body with mass m_1 located at point \vec{p_1} by the body with mass m_2 located at point \vec{p_2} is

\vec{F} = -G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2} \frac{\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}}{|\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}|}

or

\vec{F} = -G \frac{m_1 m_2}{|\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}|^3} (\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2})

that is a vector equation, but it is still the inverse-square law. the extra power of r in the denominator is needed to normalize the vector connecting point \vec{p_2} to point \vec{p_1}
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top