How does the kinematic energy appear in the work integral?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy, defined as Ec=1/2 mv^2, is connected to the work done on an object through the work integral, represented as w_{12} = ∫_1^2 δW = ∫_1^2 F ⋅ dr. The relationship arises because the work done results in a change in kinetic energy, aligning with Newton's second law, where F = dP/dt. The discussion highlights the mathematical derivation of this connection, emphasizing that the integral of force over distance translates to the change in kinetic energy. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the principles of mechanics.
AntoineCompagnie
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We call Kinetic energy Ec=1/2 mv^2

its deferral into the work integral gives:

\begin{align*}
w_{12}&=\int\limits_1^2\delta W\\
& = \int\limits_1^2 \vec F \wedge d\vec r\\
&\underbrace{=\int\limits_1^2dE_c}_{why?}
\end{align*}

But Why does the kinematic energy appears in the last equation?

Homework Equations



According to Newton's second law,

$$\vec{F}=\frac{d\vec{P}}{dt}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



Multiplicating it by $$d\vec{r}$$

\begin{align*}
\vec F \wedge d\vec r &= \frac{d\vec P}{dt} \wedge d\vec r\\
&= d\vec P \wedge \frac{d\vec r}{dt}\\
&= d\vec P \wedge \vec v\\
&= d(m\vec v) \wedge \vec v\\
\end{align*}I'm so sorry but I don't know from there..!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AntoineCompagnie said:
But Why does the kinematic energy appears in the last equation?
Work done on the body results in change in it's kinetic energy.
 
AntoineCompagnie said:

Homework Statement



We call Kinetic energy Ec=1/2 mv^2

its deferral into the work integral gives:

\begin{align*}
w_{12}&=\int\limits_1^2\delta W\\
& = \int\limits_1^2 \vec F \wedge d\vec r\\
&\underbrace{=\int\limits_1^2dE_c}_{why?}
\end{align*}

But Why does the kinematic energy appears in the last equation?

Homework Equations



According to Newton's second law,

$$\vec{F}=\frac{d\vec{P}}{dt}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



Multiplicating it by $$d\vec{r}$$

\begin{align*}
\vec F \wedge d\vec r &= \frac{d\vec P}{dt} \wedge d\vec r\\
&= d\vec P \wedge \frac{d\vec r}{dt}\\
&= d\vec P \wedge \vec v\\
&= d(m\vec v) \wedge \vec v\\
\end{align*}I'm so sorry but I don't know from there..!

If it's any consolation, none of those integrals makes mathematical sense to me. Instead:

##\vec{F}.d\vec{r} = m\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}.\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}dt = m\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}.\vec{v}dt = \frac{1}{2}m\frac{d}{dt}(\vec{v}.\vec{v})dt##

And, then if you do your line integral with ##t## as your parameter it comes out.
 
##\int_C \vec{F}.d\vec{r} = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\frac{1}{2}m \frac{d}{dt}(v^2)dt##

That's the mathematical format that I'm used to and makes sense to me. A line integral depends on the curve C not just its end- points.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top