How Does the Method of Images Determine Potential Inside a Grounded Sphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crimsonidol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Image
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electrostatic potential inside a grounded conducting sphere with a charge placed outside it. The method of images is used to show that the potential inside the sphere is equivalent to that produced by the actual charge and an image charge located at a specific distance. The potential is calculated for the region where the distance from the sphere's center is less than the distance to the image charge. The challenge lies in incorporating Legendre polynomials into the solution, as the initial approach using simple potential equations does not align with the homework's focus on Legendre topics. The user seeks guidance on how to integrate these concepts effectively.
crimsonidol
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have a grounded conducting sphere of radius R and a charge q is placed a distance a from the center of the sphere. Show that the potential in the interior produced by q and the distributed induced charge is the same as that produced by q and its image charge q'.The image charge is at a distance a'=R^2/a fro the center collinear with q and the origin. Calculate the electrostatic potential for a<R<a'. Show that potential vanishes for r=R if we take q'=-qR/a


Homework Equations


In the course we are investigating legendre equations, legendre polynomials etc.


The Attempt at a Solution


I can find potential by simply using V=Sum (1/4pieps)q/r however there is no legendre polynomial or legendre series in it. I tried Laplace's Equation however I got confused. Because in Laplace's eqn I can only deal with r. Where have I gone wrong? How should i think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just need a spark?
 
I know that solution, however there is nothing related to legendre in it. The question was given to me as a homework for Legendre equation/polynomials topic. I should o something related to that I suppose.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top