How Does the String's Path Affect Angular Momentum and Final Speed?

csnsc14320
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Mass m is attached to a post of radius R by a string. Initially it is a distance r from the center of the post and is moving tangentially with speed v_o. There are two cases: In case (a) the string passes through a hole in the center of the post at the top, while the string is gradually shortened by drawing it through the hole, and case (b) the string wraps around the outside of the post.

What quantities are conserved in each case? Find the final speed of the mass when it hits the post for each case.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So, for case (a):
Angular momentum is conserved: I_o \omega_o = I_f \omega_f

m R^2 \frac{v_o^2}{(R)^2} = m r^2 \frac{v_f^2}{r^2}

Solving for v_f we should get the right answer.

Now, case B is where I'm stumped. My initial thought is that angular momentum is conserved again, but then I end up with the exact same case I have in (a). Does the fact that the mass is rotating about the circumference of the rod, as opposed to the center of the rod, affect the speed of the mass? And, if so, how would I get started on how to find that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve for vf and see what you get. Does this make sense?
 
chrisk said:
Solve for vf and see what you get. Does this make sense?
Oops.

I_o \omega_o = I_f \omega_f

m R^2 \frac{v_o}{R} = m r^2 \frac{v_f}{r}

R v_o = r v_f

v_f = \frac{R}{r} v_o

Didn't mean to square my angular velocity in my first post.

So, knowing this for case (a), how do we obtain v_f for case (b)?

The r_o = R and r_f = r, and v_o is the same, why wouldn't the answer be the same as in case a?

Unless angular momentum isn't conserved? But I see no torque provided to cause a change in angular momentum in the first place.
 
How is the length of the string changing when pulled through the center compared to wrapping around a pole with a radius of "a"?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top