How Does Velocity Addition in Special Relativity Ensure u' Remains Less Than c?

byerly100
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Consider two reference frames, S and S', moving with speed v (<c) with respect to one another along the x direction.

If a certain object moves with velocity u (u<c) with respect to S, and velocity u' with respect to S', use the velocity addition equations (in three dimensions) to show that u'<c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried?
 
byerly100 said:
Consider two reference frames, S and S', moving with speed v (<c) with respect to one another along the x direction.

If a certain object moves with velocity u (u<c) with respect to S, and velocity u' with respect to S', use the velocity addition equations (in three dimensions) to show that u'<c.
Just write down the equations and substitute.
Then find u"^2.
 
Are you saying to take the derivative of u'?
 
Don't you know the vdlocity addition eqs in SR?
If not you have to find the ratio dx'/dt' and dy'/dt' in terms of the unprimed using the Lorentz transformation eqs. Just take the ratios. Differentiation is not needed. If the know the eqs., just substitute.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top