How Far Away is the Train When Its Headlight Disappears?

bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm having a tough time with relativity, and I thought I'd try this problem to see if I understood the topic very well.

Let's consider a train moving at 0.65c along a straight track. Its headlight produces a beam with an angular spread of 60 degrees. If you astanding alongside the track (rails are 1.5 m apart), how far from you is the train when you see its approaching headlight suddenly disappear?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a picture, but I really need a hint on how to get started. I'm thinking about using length contraction somehow, but I just can't get my head around what I need to do.

Here's the best I've got right now: From trigonometry I have x= tan(60)*.75, x = 1.3, and I'm pretty sure this isn't right.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bcjochim07 said:
Let's consider a train moving at 0.65c along a straight track. Its headlight produces a beam with an angular spread of 60 degrees. If you astanding alongside the track (rails are 1.5 m apart), how far from you is the train when you see its approaching headlight suddenly disappear?

Here's the best I've got right now: From trigonometry I have x= tan(60)*.75, x = 1.3, and I'm pretty sure this isn't right.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi bcjochim07! :smile:

.75 (or .76) is γ, but apart from that I don't understand what you're doing, or why. :confused:

What is x? What equation or diagram are you using?
 
Actually I'm going to take a second shot at this problem.


The angular spread of the headlight in the frame of the train is 60 degrees, so the observer along tracks sees this angular spread:

theta = arccos((cos(60) + 0.76)/(1+0.76cos(60)) = 24.07 degrees.

First of all, I'm picturing a moving cone of light centered on the train tracks and an observer at the side
From my drawing, I think that the headlight should disappear when you are at the point where one of the edges of the cones intersects the tracks. (On second thought, maybe this is not right?)

Anyway, I've drawn a triangle with legs x (distance of observer from train in x direction) and 0.75 (half the width between the tracks) and the angle opposite to the 0.75 side is 12.035 degrees. So I get:

0.75/x = tan(12.035) , x = 3.5 m. My book actually gives 3.0 m, so I'm not doing something right.
 
bcjochim07 said:
theta = arccos((cos(60) + 0.76)/(1+0.76cos(60)) = 24.07 degrees.

Well, that can't possibly be right, because if the train is stationary, then you replace 0.76 by 1, and the result is arccos(1).
Anyway, I've drawn a triangle with legs x (distance of observer from train in x direction) and 0.75 (half the width between the tracks) and the angle opposite to the 0.75 side is 12.035 degrees. So I get:

0.75/x = tan(12.035) , x = 3.5 m. My book actually gives 3.0 m, so I'm not doing something right.

Sorry, I've still no idea what you're doing. :confused:

The question is asking, if a ray of light is at 60º as measured on the train, then what is the angle as measured on the ground?

So use equations

put x = (√3/2)t, y = (1/2)t …

then what are x' and y' ? :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top