How Far Can I Hike Up a Mountain After a 500 Calorie Lunch?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating how far one can hike up a mountain after consuming a 500-calorie lunch, factoring in energy conversion efficiency. A participant calculated the potential energy and efficiency, arriving at a height of approximately 1569 meters. There is confusion regarding the conversion of this height into miles and the correct interpretation of calorie units, with suggestions that kilo-calories may be intended. Participants are encouraged to clarify the relevant equations for potential energy and how to proceed after determining efficiency. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate unit conversion and understanding energy concepts in hiking scenarios.
layla2525
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am 65 kg and eat a 500 Calorie lunch and go hiking up a mountain afterwards. Assuming that chemical energy is converted to gravitational potential energy with 50% efficiency, approximately how many miles up the mountain can I go before I need my dinner?

0.5 miles

1 mile

2 miles

3 miles

4 miles


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for height by (2.0 x 10^(6))/ (65kg)(9.8)
which gave me 301538.4615, and then dived it by 2 because of the efficiency and got 1569.8587, now how can i convert into miles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
250-Calorie* snack, which contains 1x10^6 J
 
layla2525 said:
250-Calorie* snack, which contains 1x10^6 J

Close yes but 250 calories is not a lot. It's likely that kilo-calories is intended.
What is a relevant equation for potential energy (in units?)
 
Last edited:
I got 1569 for my efficiency What do I do after I get the Efficiency ?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top