How far has the proton been deflected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton
AI Thread Summary
A proton with a velocity of 1.0*10^5 m/s enters a 2.0-cm-wide parallel-plate capacitor with surface charge densities of ±1.0*10^6 C/m². To determine the sideways deflection, the vertical acceleration must be calculated using the electric field, which is derived from the surface charge density. The electric field (E) can be calculated using the formula E = σ/ε₀, where σ is the surface charge density and ε₀ is the permittivity of free space. There is confusion regarding the use of σ and the relationship to area, as well as the proper units in the calculations. Clarification on these concepts and the use of LaTeX for equations is also requested.
Heart
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
A proton traveling at v= 1.0*10^5 m/s enters the gap btwn the plates of a 2.0-cm-wide parallel-plate capacitor. The surface charge densities on the plates are +-1.0*10^6 C/m2. How far has the proton been deflected sideways when it reaches the far edge of the capacitor?

I figured that the horizontal velocity would be constant so I need to find a vertical v to find how far the proton has been deflected. After that I can find the answer.

So, I need to find the acceleration to find the final vertical v by using a= eE/m.

The problem is I'm not sure how to find E in N/C w/ the given information. They give 1.0*10^6 C/m2 but I'm not sure how to convert that into E.

Any hints/tips would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believ the electric field is
E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_{0}}

Gauss theorem could prove that...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
I believ the electric field is
E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_{0}}

Gauss theorem could prove that...

Daniel.
Thanks for the reply, but if you don't mind, can you clarify a bit?

I know what epsilon_0 is but not sigma. My class hasn't reached that part yet. If sigma is given 1.0*10^-6 C/m^2, it still doesn't make sense on how E = sigma/epsilon_0; I tried but the units don't work out right.

BTW, if you don't mind, can you teach me how to get those epsilon, sigma, et cetera images? I tried copying your ... but those images don't show up, only the texts were italicized and bold.
 
1.Sorry,the units have to match...
\nabla\cdot (\epsilon_{0}\vec{E})=\rho

is Gauss law for vacuum...Your formula results immediately.

2.sigma is te electric charge surface density on the plates of the capacitator.U could have figured that after the units (C/m^{2}).

3.Yes,u mean TeX editing.Dld the file which teaches u how to write the code lines.Click on any of the formulas and then another click in the small window that pops up.It's a PDF file.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
1.Sorry,the units have to match...
\nabla\cdot (\epsilon_{0}\vec{E})=\rho

is Gauss law for vacuum...Your formula results immediately.

2.sigma is te electric charge surface density on the plates of the capacitator.U could have figured that after the units (C/m^{2}).

3.Yes,u mean TeX editing.Dld the file which teaches u how to write the code lines.Click on any of the formulas and then another click in the small window that pops up.It's a PDF file.

Daniel.

Daniel, I'm lost here. I still don't get what can I use sigma for exactly? Sigma is the electric charge/area. Only the length is given, how can I find the electric field from sigma then when I have no clue what the area is?

Also, in the above reply, I see that you use rho in the equation, but rho is not given at all. I'm really confused; if you don't mind, can you clarify a bit?

Also in the above reply, you used an upside down delta, what is that thing?
 
(in words) the electric field is equal to the surface charge density divided by the permittivity of free space. You have both numbers, so just divide them.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top