How Far Will the Spring Compress When a Block is Dropped?

AI Thread Summary
A block of mass 2.0 kg is dropped from a height of 55 cm onto a spring with a spring constant of 1960 N/m, and the goal is to determine the maximum compression of the spring. The conservation of energy principle is applied, equating the gravitational potential energy lost to the elastic potential energy gained by the spring. The relevant equations include mgh = (1/2)kx², where h is the initial height and x is the spring compression. Attempts to isolate x in the equation have led to a quadratic form, indicating that further algebraic manipulation is necessary to solve for the maximum compression. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying conservation of energy to find the solution.
jedjj
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass m = 2.0 kg is dropped from height h = 55 cm onto a spring of spring constant k = 1960 N/m. Find the maximum distance the spring is compressed.

Homework Equations


\Delta K+ \Delta U_G+ \Delta U_S=0 \change in kinetic energy+change in gravitational energy+change in spring energy=0
\Delta K=0
U_{Gf}-U_{Gi}+U_{Sf}-U_{Si}=0
U_{Si}=0 can be assumed
so
U_{Sf}=U_{Gi}-U_{Gf}

The Attempt at a Solution


resumed from above:
\frac {kx_f^2}{2}=mgy_i-mgy_f
so: \frac {kx_f^2}{2}=mgy_i-mgx_f
With this I have tried over and over to solve for x_f but I cannot find any way of getting x_f by itself.
edit:LaTeX formatting
 
Physics news on Phys.org
conservation of energy, \DeltaU(g)+ \DeltaU(spring) = 0 <=== look, all the energy lost from one object goes to the other, so the sum is 0. Remember! conservation of energy. Think about it.

\DeltaU(g)=-\DeltaU(spring) <===== moved that equation around a it... just algebra.

mgh2-mgh1 = (1/2)kx^2 <===== look what we have here if we make it look more detailed with what we know.

Or simply mgh=-(1/2)kx^2
 
Last edited:
\frac {kx_f^2}{2}=mgy_i-mgx_f
With this I have tried over and over to solve for x_f but I cannot find any way of getting x_f by itself.
It's a quadratic equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top