How fast does density change in an isobaric system?

AI Thread Summary
In an isobaric system with an ideal heater, the density of gas at a distance from the heater changes over time, influenced by factors like particle speed and collision frequency. Without equilibrium, chaotic fluctuations in density can occur due to eddies and currents. The discussion suggests simplifying the scenario to a constant environment of 100 kPa Argon at 293.2K to analyze the equilibrium time and its relationship to distance. A Navier-Stokes solver is recommended for obtaining accurate results within 15% of the true values. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for predicting gas behavior in thermal environments.
simple_logic
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Suppose the following

  • an isobaric system
  • an ideal heater(1) of infinite area on a single plane in a STP environment
  • the heater is set to a given temperature

At a given distance perpendicular to the heater surface, what will the density of the gas be over time?

I spent a good part of the day getting nowhere, hopefully someone here can help.

Thank you,

S.L.

1: All gas particle interactions with the heater result in the gas particle leaving at the set temperature of the heater
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are asked for the density p(x,t) then there isn't enough information - without equilibrium there may be eddies and currents in the gas giving chaotic density fluctuations at any point. Presumably there is something else to take into account?
 
I would speculate that in an idealized system, this would be a function of the mean air particle speed, the mean collision frequency, energy accommodation coefficient, and possibly some relaxation constant/coefficient.

We can simplify the problem further by changing the STP environment to an infinite volume of 100kPa Argon at 293.2K

I'm interested in the approximate time it takes to get to equilibrium, and the quadratic relationship to distance.

Any takers?
 
Look for a Navier-Stokes solver, it will get you an answer within 15% accuracy.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top