How fast is the skier going just before she lands?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ussjt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An extreme skier coasts down a mountain at a 25° angle, experiencing a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.200, before jumping off a cliff and landing 3.20 m below. The calculations show that her speed just before landing can be determined using energy conservation principles. The skier's initial kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy are converted into kinetic energy during her fall. It is essential to consider both the x and y components of her velocity to find the total speed upon landing. Ultimately, the skier's final speed before impact is calculated to be approximately 8.60 m/s.
ussjt
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
An extreme skier, starting from rest, coasts down a mountain that makes an angle 25.0° with the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between her skis and the snow is 0.200. She coasts for a distance of 13.4 m before coming to the edge of a cliff. Without slowing down, she skis off the cliff and lands downhill at a point whose vertical distance is 3.20 m below the edge. How fast is she going just before she lands?

W= Fn*13.4

Fn*13.4= .5mv^2

(mg sin25 - (.200)(mg cos25))(13.4)= .5mv^2

(g sin25 - (.200)(g cos25))(13.4)= .5v^2

((9.8) sin25 - (.200)((9.8) cos25))(13.4)= .5v^2

31.6949624131 = .5v^2

2(31.6949624131) = v^2

sqrt (63.3899248261) = v

7.96177899882 = v
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Vy= 7.96177899882 (sin25)

Vy= 3.36479320085
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Vy = sqrt (3.36479320085^2 + 2(-9.8)(-3.2))

Vy = 8.604756 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check your calculations, but it looks like you calculated the y-component of the final velocity. What happened to the x-component?

Tip: No need to find components of the velocity; you can use energy conservation to find the final speed.
 
do I need the x? Because once it goes into free fall it is only accelerating in the y direction.

"you can use energy conservation to find the final speed"
I am confused by what you mean.
 
ussjt said:
do I need the x? Because once it goes into free fall it is only accelerating in the y direction.
You are correct that only the y-component will accelerate, but the x-component of the velocity is needed to find the total velocity at the bottom. (It's just v^2 = v_x^2 + v_y^2.)

"you can use energy conservation to find the final speed"
I am confused by what you mean.
At the point that the skier leaves the cliff, she has a speed (which you figured out) and thus a kinetic energy. She also has gravitational PE compared to her landing point. Energy is conserved as she falls. (Gravitational PE is converted to KE as she falls.)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top