How High Did Jose Jump Above the Lowest Point on His Bungee Adventure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abeltyukov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Oscillation
AI Thread Summary
Jose, weighing 90 kg, completed a bungee jump with an initial oscillation amplitude of 9 m and a period of 4.0 s. The spring constant of the bungee cord is calculated to be 222.0661 N/m, and his maximum oscillation speed is 14.137167 m/s. With a damping constant of 6.0 kg/s, he will complete approximately 16.479 oscillations before his amplitude decreases to 1.0 m. To determine how high he jumped above the lowest point, it is suggested to consider the conversion of kinetic energy and potential energy at different points in his oscillation. Understanding these energy transformations will help solve for the height of his jump.
abeltyukov
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Jose, whose mass is 90 kg, has just completed his first bungee jump and is now bouncing up and down at the end of the cord. His oscillations have an initial amplitude of 9 m and a period of 4.0 s.2. The attempt at a solution

a) The spring constant of the bungee cord is 222.0661 N/m

b) The maximum speed at which Jose is oscillating is 14.137167 m/s

c) If the damping constant due to air resistance is 6.0 kg/s, the number of oscillations which Jose makes before his amplitude has decreased to 1.0 m is 16.479

d) From what height above the lowest point did Jose jump? (in meters)I got every other part of the question right but am having trouble figuring out part d. Do I use F=ma? Any help would be appreciated.Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The kinetic energy from Jose's fall went into two places. The first is the potential energy to stretch the bungee to a new equilibrium position (the center of his oscillations). You can get that from his weight and the spring constant. The second is any kinetic energy when he is moving. You can calculate the sum of the these at any convenient point in his oscillation - maybe easiest to do it at the top or bottom where the kinetic energy vanishes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top