How high will the pendulum rise?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tbdm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Rise
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating how high a pendulum will rise after being displaced and given an initial speed. The user applied the conservation of energy equation and the formula for height based on the pendulum's angle to find the resultant height. Their calculations yielded a height increase of approximately 0.010 meters, which was initially deemed incorrect. A suggestion was made to consider the reference height for gravitational potential energy, which could simplify the problem. Ultimately, using significant figures in the calculations resolved the issue, leading to a correct answer.
tbdm
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are given a pendulum composed of a 0.015 kg mass on the end of a 0.40 m long massless string. If the pendulum is moved 30° from the vertical and given an initial speed of 0.45 m/s tangent to the support string and away from the vertical, how much higher relative to the release point of the pendulum swing will the pendulum rise?


Homework Equations


(1/2)mv2 + mgh1 = mgh2
h=L(1-cosθ)

The Attempt at a Solution


I plugged in the values, using the second equation to find the initial height.
Mass cancels out and I have (1/2)(.45)2 + (9.8)(.4)(1-cos(30)) = (9.8)(h2)

Solving this gives the resultant height of 0.063921 m. Subtract the release height of 0.052518 m, I get that it rises 0.01033≈0.010 meters higher, however this answer is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi tbdm, Welcome to Physics Forums.

tbdm said:

Homework Statement


You are given a pendulum composed of a 0.015 kg mass on the end of a 0.40 m long massless string. If the pendulum is moved 30° from the vertical and given an initial speed of 0.45 m/s tangent to the support string and away from the vertical, how much higher relative to the release point of the pendulum swing will the pendulum rise?


Homework Equations


(1/2)mv2 + mgh1 = mgh2
h=L(1-cosθ)

The Attempt at a Solution


I plugged in the values, using the second equation to find the initial height.
Mass cancels out and I have (1/2)(.45)2 + (9.8)(.4)(1-cos(30)) = (9.8)(h2)

Solving this gives the resultant height of 0.063921 m. Subtract the release height of 0.052518 m, I get that it rises 0.01033≈0.010 meters higher, however this answer is incorrect.

Note that for changes in gravitational PE that take place near the surface of the Earth you are free to set the location of your zero reference height to anything that's convenient. In this problem they're asking for the additional height achieved from the given initial position, so you could just choose the height of that position as the zero reference for gravitational PE as well as height.

To me your solution looks okay. Is there some particular format you're supposed to use to submit it?
 
I finally tried using all of the significant figures, and that finally seemed to do it, thank you for your help!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top