Pendulum Rise from Release Point: 0.005 m

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a pendulum with a specified mass and string length, initially displaced at an angle and given a tangential speed. The goal is to determine how much higher the pendulum will rise relative to its release point.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original poster's calculations involving kinetic and potential energy, noting potential errors in the use of mass in equations and the handling of angles.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the original poster's approach, with some participants suggesting alternative methods and questioning the accuracy of angle calculations. Several participants have offered insights into possible sources of error without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion between radians and degrees, as well as the implications of rounding errors in intermediate steps. The original poster has indicated that they canceled mass from their equations, which has been a point of discussion.

386221
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are given a pendulum composed of a 0.030 kg mass on the end of a 0.60 m long massless string. If the pendulum is moved 30° from the vertical and given an initial speed of 0.39 m/s tangent to the support string and away from the vertical, how much higher relative to the release point of the pendulum swing will the pendulum rise?


Homework Equations


KE=1/2mv^2
PE=mgL(1-cosθ)


The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I did. I found the velocity at the bottom of the swing.
1/2vf^2 = 1/2vi^2 + mgL(1-cosθ)
and I got vf= 1.3 m/s
Then I did the same thing again, except I set vi to 1.3 and vf = 0
1/2vi^2 = mgL(1-cosθ)
and find θ, which I got 31.1 then I subtracted Lcos30 by Lcos31.1 and got .005 m. The answer is incorrect, can anyone help? BTW I already canceled out the mass in all the above work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems you forgot the m's in your kinetic energies??
 
Hi 386221

Welcome to PF!

Your work looks good to me .What is the correct answer ?
 
I haven't checked the data, Tanya Sharma, but it seems that OP is using 1/2v^2, rather than 1/2mv^2.
I agree that OP, apart from that seems to have chosen a correct, if somewhat overcomplicated solution since there is no need to use the intermediate position at the bottom.
 
386221 said:

Homework Statement


You are given a pendulum composed of a 0.030 kg mass on the end of a 0.60 m long massless string. If the pendulum is moved 30° from the vertical and given an initial speed of 0.39 m/s tangent to the support string and away from the vertical, how much higher relative to the release point of the pendulum swing will the pendulum rise?


Homework Equations


KE=1/2mv^2
PE=mgL(1-cosθ)


The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I did. I found the velocity at the bottom of the swing.
1/2vf^2 = 1/2vi^2 + mgL(1-cosθ)
and I got vf= 1.3 m/s
Then I did the same thing again, except I set vi to 1.3 and vf = 0
1/2vi^2 = mgL(1-cosθ)
and find θ, which I got 31.1 then I subtracted Lcos30 by Lcos31.1 and got .005 m. The answer is incorrect, can anyone help? BTW I already canceled out the mass in all the above work.
check again.
 
arildno said:
I haven't checked the data, Tanya Sharma, but it seems that OP is using 1/2v^2, rather than 1/2mv^2.
I agree that OP, apart from that seems to have chosen a correct, if somewhat overcomplicated solution since there is no need to use the intermediate position at the bottom.

I checked the data before replying.OP has mentioned that he canceled the masses in his work,which he/she did.He/She has erroneously written 1/2v^2 instead of 1/2mv^2.
 
`Well, then his "incorrect" answer might just mean that he rounded off numbers in an incorrect way in his intermediate step.
Thank you, Tanya Sharma, for having checked the data! :smile:
 
For an easier method just set potential energy at the point of beginning of motion as 0.
##U_i+K_i=U_f+K_f##
##K_i=U_f##
##1/2(mv^2)=mg\Delta h##
 
There is a couple of sources for errors which might explain the incorrectness of OP's answer:
1. He might at some point have made a mix-up of radians versus degrees.
2. Or, and I think this is the likeliest source for the error error: the arccosine function is typically defined relative to the interval 0 to pi, while in this problem, the answer might have be given for angles in the interval -pi/2 to pi/2 instead. That is, a minus sign might be missing in OP's solution for the angle.
 
  • #10
The angle is slightly off...31.0323136133
(and there was another error in cos31.1)
 
  • #11
I tried changing the second angle to 31.03 and got delta h of .009 and it was wrong. I also tried using 1/2mv^2=mgh and got .0077 for h and that was wrong as well. I honestly have no clue on how to proceed all my work seems correct...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K