How High Would a Bullet Rise if Fired Straight Up Without Air Resistance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter needhelp83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Height
AI Thread Summary
When a .22-caliber bullet is fired straight up at a muzzle speed of 360 m/s, it would theoretically rise to a maximum height of 6,612 meters without air resistance. The calculation involves using the equation y = (v^2 - initial v^2) / (2a), where 'v' is the final velocity (0 m/s at the peak) and 'a' is the acceleration due to gravity (-9.8 m/s^2). Some participants humorously noted the impracticality of such a height, suggesting a more realistic maximum height would be around 6 kilometers. The discussion also highlighted the importance of calculating the time to reach this height, which can be derived from the initial speed divided by gravitational acceleration. Overall, the calculations confirm that, theoretically, the bullet could reach an extreme altitude if air resistance were not a factor.
needhelp83
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
I can't figure out if I set this problem up correctly. Any help?

The muzzle speed of a 22-caliber bullet fired from a rifle is 360 m/s. If there were no air resistance, how high would this bullet rise when fired straight up?

v^2=intial v^2+2ay
y=v^2-initial v^2/2a=(0-(360 m/s)^2)/2(-9.80 m/s^2)=6,612 m


The maximum height reached is 6,612 m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, could you imagine a bullet being shot in the air and reaching a maximum heaight of 6.6 meters? lol:P

First find the time it takes...360/9.8...then it should be relatively simple to figure out
 
No, 6km is correct. Youll find a general term for what you described above as:

h = y(peak) = \frac{V(y)^2}{2g}

Where V(y) is the initial vertical component of the velocity
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top