How Is Angular Velocity Calculated in a Hinged Rod Scenario?

Victorian91
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform rod AB is hinged smoothly at A. The length L of the rod is 50cm. Determine
a) The angular velocity,


of the rod when it makes an angle (Theta) =30o with the verticle.

( Moment of inertia of rod about axis through one end and perpendicular to the rod = 1/3 mL2 ; g =9.8m s-2


Homework Equations


Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf


The Attempt at a Solution



0 + mghi = 1/2 Iw2 + mghf

Where hi = 1/2 L

and hf = 1/2 L ( 1-cos Theta )

Then plugging in the information given,
Angular velocity = 7.1 rad s-1

When the rod is vertical, let the horizontal line which passes through the center of the rod be the reference line where h=0 and U=0.

Can anybody tell me why the final potential energy is not just 1/2 L cos Theta.

Or is it 1/2 L ( 1-cos Theta ) ?

Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Victorian91 said:
Can anybody tell me why the final potential energy is not just 1/2 L cos Theta.

Or is it 1/2 L ( 1-cos Theta ) ?

Hi Victorian91! :smile:

(have a theta: θ :wink:)

potential energy can be measured from anywhere

it's your choice …

if you chose to measure it from θ = 0, then you have make sure that it's 0 at θ = 0 :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top