How Is Arc Length in Polar Coordinates Used in Real Life?

AI Thread Summary
Arc length in polar coordinates has practical applications in various fields, including physics and engineering. It is used to calculate the work done by a force over a curved path, which is important in mechanics. Additionally, arc length is relevant in the design of roller coasters, where understanding the curves and slopes is crucial for safety and performance. Other potential applications include robotics, computer graphics, and any scenario involving circular or spiral paths. Understanding these applications can enhance the comprehension of arc length's significance in real-world contexts.
o0123456543210o
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
i am a high school student currently taking ap calculus. i am currently working on a research project on arc length in polar coordinates. through all of my research thus far the one thing that has eluded my grasp so far that is really frustrating is the applications in real life for arc length. :smile:

if you know anything about this topic or applications of it i would be greatfull for your help because it would allow me to make sure that i have got this topic down pat. :rolleyes:


Gracias :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What would you consider as an "application of arc length" in real life?
The following might be considered as such:

The work done by a force acting on an object satisfies the inequality:

0<=W<=F*l,

where W is the the (absolute) value of the work done, F is the magnitude of the force, and l is the arc length of the distance traversed by the object.
 
what i mean by applications, is something that you would actually use arc length for in real life business industry designing something :smile:
i was thinking along the lines of roller coasters :surprise:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top