How Is Centripetal Acceleration Related to the Period of Clock Hands?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between centripetal acceleration and the period of motion for the second and minute hands of a clock. The centripetal acceleration formula a_c = v^2/r is highlighted, with emphasis on how it relates to the period of motion. The user seeks to determine the periods for both clock hands, noting they are of equal length, and asks for the ratio of their centripetal accelerations. The response provides parametric equations and derivations to clarify the relationship between angular velocity and centripetal acceleration. Overall, the conversation aims to simplify the concepts for better comprehension.
rockmorg
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hey all -

I've got a problem that's rather encompassing...

The second hand and the minute hand on one type of clock are the same length. What is the period T of the motion for the second hand and for the minute hand?

It goes on to say the centripetal acceleration is given by a_c = v^2/r where v is speed and r is the radius. How is centripetal acceleration related to the period?

And then finally it asks for the ratio a_c, second / a_c, minute for the tips of the second hand and the minute hand.

I'm not even sure where to start really...

Any help would be great, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rockmorg said:
Hey all -
I've got a problem that's rather encompassing...
The second hand and the minute hand on one type of clock are the same length. What is the period T of the motion for the second hand and for the minute hand?
It goes on to say the centripetal acceleration is given by a_c = v^2/r where v is speed and r is the radius. How is centripetal acceleration related to the period?
And then finally it asks for the ratio a_c, second / a_c, minute for the tips of the second hand and the minute hand.
I'm not even sure where to start really...
Any help would be great, thanks!
Basically if you take the parametric equations:

x=r\cos{\omega t}
y=r\sin{\omega t}

...and note that the second derivatives (acceleration) are:

x''=-\omega^2 r\cos{\omega t}
y''=-\omega^2 r\sin{\omega t}

The magnitude is therefore:

\left|\vec{a}\right|=\omega^2 r=\frac{v^2}{r}

because

\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\frac{v}{r}

Can you use this information and try to answer your question?

Alex
 
Sounds complicated.. heh. I'll try and trudge my way thru it and see if I can make more sense of it...

thanks for the input
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top