How Is Energy Transformed in a Satellite's Decaying Orbit Due to Air Friction?

AI Thread Summary
A 500-kg satellite in a 500 km orbit experiences energy transformation due to air friction as it descends to Earth, impacting at 2.00 km/s. The total energy of the satellite is calculated to be approximately -1.45 x 10^10 J, while the kinetic energy before impact is 1 x 10^9 J. The energy loss due to friction is estimated at 1.55 x 10^9 J, but the expected answer is 1.58 x 10^9 J. The discussion highlights the necessity of accounting for potential energy changes during descent, as potential energy continuously converts to kinetic energy. Understanding these energy transformations is crucial for accurate calculations in orbital mechanics.
Zynoakib
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 500-kg satellite is in a circular orbit at an altitude of
500 km above the Earth’s surface. Because of air friction,
the satellite eventually falls to the Earth’s surface,
where it hits the ground with a speed of 2.00 km/s. How
much energy was transformed into internal energy by
means of air friction?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Total Energy of satellite = PE = KE
= G(mass of satellite)(mass of Earth)/ - 2 (Earth's radius + orbit's height)
= -1.45 x 10^10 J

KE before crash = 0.5 (500)(2000)^2 = 1 x 10^9 J

Energy loss due to friction

- 1.45 x 10^10 - 1 x 10^9 = 1.55 x 10^9 J

But the answer is 1.58 x 10^9 J, what is missing?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you account for all the energy? What about the potential energy change from orbit to surface?
 
gneill said:
Did you account for all the energy? What about the potential energy change from orbit to surface?

Why do I need to include PE change? Shouldn't all the PE energy be converted to KE right before it crashes? So the PE change will be included into KE.
 
Zynoakib said:
Why do I need to include PE change? Shouldn't all the PE energy be converted to KE right before it crashes? So the PE change will be included into KE.
PE will be changed to KE continuously as the object changes its radial position. The KE it gains as a result must figure into what remains at the end of its journey.

Suppose we consider a slightly different situation. Suppose an object with the same mass as the satellite is momentarily stationary above the surface at the same height as the satellite orbit and falls straight down to the surface. Ignoring air friction, what will be its KE and velocity at impact? Where did that KE come from? It's initial orbital KE was zero...
 
  • Like
Likes Zynoakib
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top