How Is Gravitational Acceleration Expressed Using Distance and Time Intervals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter monkeylord714
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
AI Thread Summary
Gravitational acceleration (g) can be expressed in terms of distance (s) and time intervals (t0, t1, t2, t3) by applying Newton's second law. The discussion emphasizes the importance of deriving the ball's position function using the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. A common approach is to relate acceleration to distance over time squared, leading to the equation g = s/t^2. However, participants clarify that simply multiplying g by time does not yield a valid expression for distance. The conversation encourages using established equations for systems with constant acceleration as a starting point for solving the problem.
monkeylord714
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a physics laboratory the value of g, the gravitational acceleration in the vicinity of earth, has been measured accurately by projecting a ball up an evacuated tube and electronically timing the passage of the ball in its upward and downward flight through two light beams, an accurately known distance s apart. If the successive times of passage through the beams are: t0, t1, t2, and t3, express g in terms of s, and the times of the passage of the ball

Homework Equations



I really do not know how to begin this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I want to multiply g to t0, t1, t2... etc and then set it equal to s. But I don't think that is the correct way
 
Physics news on Phys.org
monkeylord714 said:

Homework Statement



In a physics laboratory the value of g, the gravitational acceleration in the vicinity of earth, has been measured accurately by projecting a ball up an evacuated tube and electronically timing the passage of the ball in its upward and downward flight through two light beams, an accurately known distance s apart. If the successive times of passage through the beams are: t0, t1, t2, and t3, express g in terms of s, and the times of the passage of the ball

Homework Equations



I really do not know how to begin this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I want to multiply g to t0, t1, t2... etc and then set it equal to s. But I don't think that is the correct way
Almost every problem of this type starts with a look at what Newton's second law says about it. Use it to find a function that gives you the ball's position at each time. (The formula will contain some variables whose values are unknown). Then find a way to use that function.

If you just multiply g with one of those times, you get something with units of length/time, i.e. a velocity, so it can't be equal to s.
 
Hi, this is my first semester of physics and I want to get as much practice as possible so I decided to give this a whirl and would love if someone could confirm if I'm correct or not.

Basically by using Newtons second law I started off with F=ma, well in this case force could also be considered weight or mg so now I got mg = ma.

I changed "a" to equal distance (s) over time squared so mg = m(s/t^2) and canceled out the mass to get g = s/t^2. Thanks to anyone who might respond with some feedback
 
Godliath said:
Basically by using Newtons second law I started off with F=ma, well in this case force could also be considered weight or mg so now I got mg = ma.

I changed "a" to equal distance (s) over time squared so mg = m(s/t^2) and canceled out the mass to get g = s/t^2. Thanks to anyone who might respond with some feedback
That's not the correct answer, and if it had been, your post would have been in violation of the rules of the homework forum. We don't give out solutions here. We just give hints, and point out mistakes. So I'm afraid I can't help you (Godliath) much in this thread. If you and I discuss this problem here, we would be giving away too much information to monkeylord714.

I will elaborate just a little bit on what I said before. If we denote the distance from the floor by x, we can write Newton's 2nd in the form mx''(t)=F. What is F? Figure it out, and then integrate twice to find x.
 
Hi monkeylord 714. Welcome to physics forums!

You didn't write down any equations in item 2 of the template, but you need a place to start. Did you learn any equations in your course for relating distance, velocity, acceleration, and time for systems in which the acceleration is constant? These will have to be your starting point. Please write down the associated equations you have had in your course.

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top