How is Kepler's Third Law Applied to Uranus' Moons?

AI Thread Summary
Kepler's Third Law is applied to calculate the constant Ku for Uranus' moons using the formula K = (r)^3/(T)^2. The user successfully calculated K for Ophelia, yielding a value of 1.48 x 10^14 m³/s² after converting distance and time units. They noted that similar K values should be obtained for the other moons, indicating consistency in the calculations. For the remaining moons, the user proposed using the average K value of 1.47 x 10^14 m³/s² to solve for the orbital periods. This approach is confirmed as valid for determining the missing information for the other moons.
Mary1910
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Determine Kepler's third-law constant Ku for Uranus using the data for the first four moons.

Homework Equations


[/B]
(r)^3/(T)^2 = K

Data:
Moon #1 (Ophelia)
r=5.38 x 10^4 km
T=0.375 Earth Days

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I know the question asks for the K constant for the first four moons, but I'm only posting my attempt for the first moon, just so I can confirm that I am solving them correctly.

K=(r)^3/(T)^2

first convert km to m
(5.38 x 10^4km)(1000m)
=5.38 x 10^7 m

and then Earth days to seconds
(0.375 Earth days)(86400s)
=32400 s

K=(5.38 x 10^7)^3 / (32400)^2
K=1.48 x 10^14 m3/s2

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculating the other moons is a great opportunity to test the results - the numbers should be similar for all four moons. If you get different results something is wrong, if you get the same result the answer is right.
 
mfb said:
Calculating the other moons is a great opportunity to test the results - the numbers should be similar for all four moons. If you get different results something is wrong, if you get the same result the answer is right.
Thanks, and yes the Kepler constants for the other four moons were very close to the result I have for the first moon.

Question b) In this problem asked me to find the average K value for all four moons. I then added all four together and then divided by four to have 1.47 x 10^14 m3/s2. In question c) we are asked to complete the missing information for the rest of the moons listed.

Ex. Moon #5(Rosalind)
r=6.99 x 10^4 km
T=?
K=?

Since the K value is missing, would it make sense to sub the average K value from part b (1.47 x 10^14 m3/s2) into K=(r)^3/(T)^2 and then solve for T?

Thanks for your help.
 
Mary1910 said:
Since the K value is missing, would it make sense to sub the average K value from part b (1.47 x 10^14 m3/s2) into K=(r)^3/(T)^2 and then solve for T?
Sure.
 
mfb said:
Sure.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top