How Is Linear Charge Distribution a Realistic Model in Capacitor Charging?

E_M_C
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
The problem is stated:

The preceding problem was an artificial model for the charging capacitor, designed to avoid complications associated with the current spreading out over the surface of the plates. For a more realistic model, imagine thin wires that connect to the centers of the plates (the plates are circular). Again, the current I is constant, the radius of the capacitor is a, and the separation of the plates is w « a. Assume that the current flows out over the plates in such a way that the surface charge is uniform, at any given time, and is zero at t = 0.

Find the electric field between the plates, as a function of t.


I understand that I have to use Gauss' Law to find the E-field, but first I have to find the charge distribution Q(t), this is where I'm having some difficulty. After a lot of frustration, I peeked at part of the solution, and I found that the charge distribution is Q(t) = It. I assume it was arrived at as follows:

I = \frac{dQ(t)}{dt} → \int dQ = \int I dt → Q(t) = It

I was surprised to see that the charge distribution is a linear function, as I was expecting an exponential expression. Maybe I'm not getting the concept of a "uniform surface charge", but I don't see how a linear charge distribution is a "realistic model." For example, what happens as t → ∞? The charge distribution blows up. How is that realistic?

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge of the capacitor is the time integral of the current. If the current is constant in time the charge is a linear function of time.
Charge distribution refers to the distribution of charge along the surface of the capacitor plate. It is assumed to be homogeneous: The surface charge density is σ=Q/A where A is the area of a plate, A=a22π. The problem asks the electric field as function of time. Apply Gauss' Law.
Of course, the constant current can not be maintained for infinity: but it is possible for some finite time. There are devices "current generators" which provide constant current.

ehild
 
Thanks ehild.

I suppose that I was just over-thinking the problem. The idea of the capacitor being attached to a current source did cross my mind, but I couldn't think past the limitations of a linear solution.

After some more careful thought, I realized that the exponential solution I was expecting would only arise when the capacitor is in series with a resistor.
 
E_M_C said:
After some more careful thought, I realized that the exponential solution I was expecting would only arise when the capacitor is in series with a resistor.

You thought it correctly in case you charge the capacitor with a voltage source with constant emf through a resistor. The current will decrease exponentially with time constant RC.

ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top