How Is Spin-Orbit Coupling Derived from the Dirac Equation?

amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
I have read in the internet that "One naturally derive the dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression of kinetic energy:

##\mathbf H^2=c^2\mathbf P^2 +m^2c^4## where ##\mathbf P## is the canonical momentum.
Inclusion of electric and magnetic potentials ##\phi## and ##A## by substituting ##\mathbf P -εA##in ##\mathbf P## and ##\mathbf H -ε\phi## in ##\mathbf H## we get ##(\mathbf H -ε\phi)^2=(c\mathbf P -εA)^2+m^2c^4##

1-My first question is: Why potential and electric potentials are included in that way, I mean ##\mathbf P -εA##in ##\mathbf P## and ##\mathbf H -ε\phi## in ##\mathbf H##?

Then the text I am reading continued to the part where he stated the dirac equation which is:

##(\mathbf H-c\sum_{\mu}p_{\mu}-\beta mc^2)\psi=0##

Now with the fact that## [\mathbf H -ε\phi -cα.(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A) -\beta mc^2][\mathbf H -ε\phi +cα.(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A) +\beta mc^2]\psi=0##

Using the approximation that the kinetic and the potential energies are small compared to mc^2, two components of the spin function can be neglected and the equation above take the form :

##[1/2m(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A)^2 +ε\phi -(ε\hbar/2mc)\sigma \cdot \mathbf B -(ε\hbar/4m^2c^2)\mathbf E \cdot \mathbf p -(ε\hbar/4m^2c^2)σ \cdot (\mathbf E \times \mathbf p)]\psi=W\psi##
Where W +mc^2 is the total energy.

2-My second question is how we can reach the second formula, If somebody can give me some hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What internet was that? Mine says

No results found for "naturally derive the dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression of kinetic".​
 
I downloaded this chapter.It is in the first page.
 

Attachments

It says "One naturally arrives at the Dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression for the kinetic energy" . Hard to find an author, though.

Anyway, taking ##e\phi## and ##e\vec A## into account as shown is standard (naturally :smile:), see e.g here or here
 
  • Like
Likes amjad-sh
BvU said:
It says "One naturally arrives at the Dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression for the kinetic energy" . Hard to find an author, though.

Anyway, taking ##e\phi## and ##e\vec A## into account as shown is standard (naturally :smile:), see e.g here or here

Thanks,this was helpful.
I got the answer of my first question, can you give me some hints to reach the last equation?
 
amjad-sh said:
I got the answer of my first question, can you give me some hints to reach the last equation?
Do you know what ##\alpha## and ##\beta## are? You are going to need that, along with the identity
$$
(\mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{A})(\mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{B}) = \mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{B} + i \mathbf{\sigma} \cdot (\mathbf{A} \times \mathbf{B})
$$

By the way, you can find much better derivations of the spin-orbit coupling than the document you posted. Check out instead one of
Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics
Bransden and Joachain, Physics of Atoms and Molecules
Friedrich, Theoretical Atomic Physics
 
  • Like
Likes amjad-sh and BvU
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top