I How Is Summation Changed to Integration in Reif's Statistical Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
In Reif's Statistical Mechanics, the transition from summation to integration in Equation 1.5.17 is justified by the concept of approximating discrete values as continuous. This relationship is rooted in calculus, where limits are used to transition from finite sums to integrals as step sizes approach zero. However, not all mathematical functions are continuous and differentiable, which can complicate the application of these principles. Most physics problems are suitable for basic calculus methods, allowing for a straightforward application of these concepts. Understanding when to apply these rules requires deeper mathematical analysis, but for practical purposes, sticking to established methods is generally effective.
Abhishek11235
Messages
174
Reaction score
39
This is the text from Reif Statistical mechanics. In the screenshot he changes the summation to integral(Eq. 1.5.17) by saying that they are approximately continuous values. However,I don't see how. Can anyone justify this change?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2019-03-22-13-02-21.png
    Screenshot_2019-03-22-13-02-21.png
    74.2 KB · Views: 490
Physics news on Phys.org
Abhishek11235 said:
This is the text from Reif Statistical mechanics. In the screenshot he changes the summation to integral(Eq. 1.5.17) by saying that they are approximately continuous values. However,I don't see how. Can anyone justify this change?
Do you understand the relation between summation and integrals?

 
Abhishek11235 said:
Can anyone justify this change?
Basic ideas that you start with in Calculus take you from big steps to small steps and then you look at the limit as the step size approaches zero. That sort of relationship can be regarded as as 'continuous'. BUT that doesn't apply to all relationships. Not all relationships or mathematical functions are 'continuous and differentiable' over their whole range and you cannot do simple calculus in those cases. It is lucky (?) that most of the Physics we start off with is amenable to basic calculus methods (differentiation and integration). If you want to get deep into mathematical analysis methods then it will make you able to make choices about when you can and when you can't use basic calculus but, if you are like most of us, you just stick to the 'rules' that they use in book work and you won't go far wrong.
 

Thread 'The Physics of unloading sand from a barge'

I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Understanding Energy States in Complex Systems
Replies
4
Views
18K
I Dimensional analysis involving partial derivatives
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Existential problem on Electromagnetism and the combination of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Confusion about the entropy of mixing
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Mechanism of Energy Conservation in Zero-Amplitude Sum of EM Waveforms
Replies
12
Views
619
How much statistical mechanics is enough for a physicist?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Can Continuous Approximation Improve Understanding of 1D Random Walks?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Proof of the Equipartition Theorem
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Localising a non integral domain at a prime
Replies
17
Views
1K
I Integration of differential forms
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top