prakhargupta3301
- 58
- 1
Since it shows back bonding, shouldn't it be a little more than that?
The discussion revolves around the bond angles in boron trifluoride (BF3), specifically questioning why the bond angle is 120 degrees despite the presence of back bonding (BB). Participants explore the implications of hybridization and the trigonal planar structure of BF3.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether back bonding should increase the bond angle in BF3, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific effects of back bonding on the bond angles.
Participants express uncertainty about the extent to which back bonding influences bond angles, and there are unresolved questions about the nature of bond angle changes in the context of BF3's structure.
Thanks but I've already been there.jim mcnamara said:
What number would it increase to?prakhargupta3301 said:So why doesn't it increases the bond angle?
Um. I don't know.TeethWhitener said:What number would it increase to?
mjc123 said:Which bond angle? all three? Is that possible?
Edit: ninja'd by mjc123
prakhargupta3301 said:An increase in all three is just impossible.
Yes (I can't speak for mjc, but that's what I was thinking)prakhargupta3301 said:Is that what you mean?
Okay thanks for helping me!TeethWhitener said:Yes (I can't speak for mjc, but that's what I was thinking)