How Is the Equilibrium Temperature Derived in a Coaxial Cylinder Configuration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equilibrium temperature of an inner cylinder in a coaxial cylinder configuration, where the inner cylinder is heated by an electric current and the outer cylinder is maintained at a constant temperature. The heat diffusion equation is solved, leading to a temperature expression that includes a logarithmic term and a heat source term related to the current and resistivity. Participants debate the inclusion of a specific term in the solution, with emphasis on the absence of angular dependence in the problem. The correct approach involves recognizing that heat is conducted through the gas between the cylinders, not generated within it, and that the inner cylinder's high thermal conductivity allows for uniform temperature distribution. The discussion concludes with the need to calculate the heat flux to establish the temperature difference across the gas layer.
Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Gas with thermal conductivity κ fills the space between two coaxial cylinders
(inner cylinder radius a, outer cylinder inner radius b). A current I is passed through
the inner cylinder, which has resistivity ρ. Derive an expression for the equilibrium temperature of the inner cylinder Ta when the outer cylinder is held at a constant temperature Tb.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


so for the equilibrium case we have ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} =0##

Solving the heat diffusion equation in cylindrical coordinates with a heat source H we get

##T=-\frac{Hr^2}{4\kappa}+c_1 \ln{r} +c_2## where ##H=\frac{I^2\rho}{A^2}## where A is the C.S.A of the inner cylinder.

I can see that we have one boundary condition, namely ##T=T_b## at r=b but i cannot see the second boundary condition.

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physgeek64 said:
##T=-\frac{Hr^2}{4\kappa}+c_1 \ln{r} +c_2##
I don't think the term ##-\frac{Hr^2}{4\kappa}## should be here since solutions of the polar Laplace equation contains powers of ##r## only when there is angular dependence in the solution. Here the problem is radially symmetric.
Physgeek64 said:
but i cannot see the second boundary condition.
The other boundary condition is a neumann boundary condition at ##r=a##. The condition satisfies Fourier's Law for heat flow
$$\mathbf{q}=-k\nabla_{r=a} T$$
##\mathbf{q}## is the heat flux density which is related to the power dissipated by the resistive cylinder.
 
NFuller said:
I don't think the term ##-\frac{Hr^2}{4\kappa}## should be here since solutions of the polar Laplace equation contains powers of ##r## only when there is angular dependence in the solution. Here the problem is radially symmetric.
I don't understand. We don't have angular dependence here so surely we can have non linear dependence on r. If you work through the algebra I can't see how I could not include this term.

NFuller said:
The other boundary condition is a neumann boundary condition at ##r=a##. The condition satisfies Fourier's Law for heat flow
$$\mathbf{q}=-k\nabla_{r=a} T$$
##\mathbf{q}## is the heat flux density which is related to the power dissipated by the resistive cylinder.

I'm not too sure how to use this without knowing how to calculate q
 
Physgeek64 said:
We don't have angular dependence here so surely we can have non linear dependence on r.
Correct, so the solution depends on the natural log of ##r##, which is non-linear. Terms involving powers of ##r## would generally have a sin and/or cosine term attached to it. Since there is no angular dependence, those terms should not appear in the solution.
Physgeek64 said:
I'm not too sure how to use this without knowing how to calculate q
The power dissipated by the resistive inner cylinder can be found from ohms law and the definition of electrical power as
$$P=I^{2}R$$
and the resistance ##R## is related to resistivity ##\rho## by
$$R=\rho\frac{l}{A}$$
where ##l## is the length of the cylinder and ##A## is the cross sectional area.

Since the system is assumed to be at equilibrium, the electrical power dissipation should be equal to the rate of energy dissipation as heat. The heat flux out of the inner cylinder is then
$$P=\oint_{r=a}\mathbf{q}\cdot d\mathbf{a}$$
Since the flux is radially symmetric, ##\mathbf{q}## can be taken out of the integral giving
$$P=qA=q2\pi a l$$
Using these formulas can you construct an equation for ##q##?
 
Physgeek64 said:

Homework Statement


Gas with thermal conductivity κ fills the space between two coaxial cylinders
(inner cylinder radius a, outer cylinder inner radius b). A current I is passed through
the inner cylinder, which has resistivity ρ. Derive an expression for the equilibrium temperature of the inner cylinder Ta when the outer cylinder is held at a constant temperature Tb.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


so for the equilibrium case we have ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} =0##

Solving the heat diffusion equation in cylindrical coordinates with a heat source H we get

##T=-\frac{Hr^2}{4\kappa}+c_1 \ln{r} +c_2## where ##H=\frac{I^2\rho}{A^2}## where A is the C.S.A of the inner cylinder.

I can see that we have one boundary condition, namely ##T=T_b## at r=b but i cannot see the second boundary condition.

Many thanks
Your solution assumes that the heat is being generated within the conducting medium (i.e., the gas) rather than within the inner cylinder. This is not what the problem statement says.

In this problem, they didn't state it, but you are supposed to assume that the thermal conductivity of the inner cylinder is very high so that its temperature is uniform. So you have a heat flow out of the inner cylinder through the intervening annular region of gas. This is straight heat conduction with no heat generation within the gas. You are supposed to determine the temperature difference across the annular region of gas, knowing the rate of heat flow.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top