How Is the Fetal Heart Wall Speed Calculated Using Ultrasound?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hotmail590
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Speed
AI Thread Summary
The calculation of fetal heart wall speed using ultrasound involves understanding the Doppler effect, where sound waves reflect off a moving object, in this case, the fetal heart wall. The frequency of the reflected sound is altered due to the heart's movement toward the sound receiver, resulting in a detected beat frequency of 90 beats per second. The speed of sound in body tissue is given as 1500 m/s, and the equations used must account for two Doppler shifts. The final calculation indicates that the speed of the fetal heart wall is approximately 3.5 cm/sec. Proper algebraic manipulation of the equations is crucial for accurate results.
hotmail590
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
A sound wave travels at a frequency 1.95 Mhz through a pregnant woman's abdomen and is reflected from the fetal heart wall of her unborn baby. The heart wall is moving toward the sound receiver as the heart beats. The reflected sound is then mixed with the transmitted sound, and 90.0 beats per second are detected. The speed of sound in body tissue is 1500 m/s.

Here is what I came up with so far.


(freq of beats) = [(speed of sound in body tissue)+(speed of listener, the reciever)]/[(speed of sound in body tissue)+(speed of source, the heart wall)] * (given freq sound wave) - (given freq sound wave)


so

90 = (1500 +0)/(1500 + speed of heart wall) *1.95x10^6 - 1.95x10^6

and I end up with a negative number -.06922


What am I am doing wrong??


Thank you for your help.




I also tried just entering .06922 however the answer was still wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hotmail590 said:
A sound wave travels at a frequency 1.95 Mhz through a pregnant woman's abdomen and is reflected from the fetal heart wall of her unborn baby. The heart wall is moving toward the sound receiver as the heart beats. The reflected sound is then mixed with the transmitted sound, and 90.0 beats per second are detected. The speed of sound in body tissue is 1500 m/s.

Here is what I came up with so far.


(freq of beats) = [(speed of sound in body tissue)+(speed of listener, the reciever)]/[(speed of sound in body tissue)+(speed of source, the heart wall)] * (given freq sound wave) - (given freq sound wave)
The beat frequency represents the difference between the frequencies of the incident and reflected sound waves. This is due to doppler shift. But you have to keep in mind that there are two doppler effects here. The heart wall is moving toward the source, which is equivalent to the source moving toward the heart wall, so the frequency which it 'hears' is doppler shifted up:

f_1 = \frac{v}{v - v_{hw}}f_0

The reflected sound is again doppler shifted up because the source (the heart wall) is moving toward the observer:

f_2 = \frac{v}{v - v_{hw}}f_1

It is the difference f_2-f_0 that is detected as the beat frequency.

AM
 
I used the second equation that you have explained; however this time I get
.069227

here is what I did

1500/(1500+Vheart) * 1.95x10^6 = 90 + 1.95*10^6


Am I using the equations incorrectly?
 
hotmail590 said:
I used the second equation that you have explained; however this time I get
.069227

here is what I did

1500/(1500+Vheart) * 1.95x10^6 = 90 + 1.95*10^6


Am I using the equations incorrectly?
No. You are using only one part of the doppler shift. There are two doppler shifts, effectively doubling the frequency shift.

f_2 = \frac{v^2}{(v - v_{hw})^2}f_0

The speed of the heart wall should be about half of your figure.

I would suggest that you develop the solution algebraically before plugging in numbers. It is easier to follow for you and for us.

AM
 
would f2 = the given 90 beats and f0 = the given frequency? 1.95x10^6? v = given speed of sound in body 1500 m/s

after when i used those , i get an answer that is very very big.
 
hotmail590 said:
would f2 = the given 90 beats and f0 = the given frequency? 1.95x10^6? v = given speed of sound in body 1500 m/s

after when i used those , i get an answer that is very very big.
f_2 - f_0 = \frac{v^2}{(v - v_{hw})^2}f_0 - f_0

\Delta v = \sqrt{\frac{v^2}{(\Delta f/f_0 + 1)}}

\Delta v = \sqrt{\frac{1.5e3^2}{(90/1.95e6 + 1)}}

\Delta v = \sqrt{\frac{2.25e6}{(90/1950000 + 1)}

\Delta v = v - v_{hw} = 1499.965 m/sec

So:

v_{hw} = 3.5e-2 = 3.5 cm/sec

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top