How Is the Formula for Kinetic Energy Derived?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the derivation of the kinetic energy formula K = 0.5mv^2, emphasizing that it represents kinetic energy, not average kinetic energy. It explains that the formula arises from the work-energy principle, where work done equals the change in kinetic energy. The relationship between force, mass, and acceleration is highlighted, leading to the conclusion that the work done on an object results in its kinetic energy change. Additionally, it notes that the formula reflects relative kinetic energy based on initial velocity conditions. Overall, the thread provides insights into the foundational concepts of kinetic energy in physics.
Haftred
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain the derivation of the common formula for average kinetic energy: K = 0.5mv^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Derivation of KE?

a = v^2 - v0^2 / 2d

ΣWork = ΣF * d = mad = 0.5m(v^2 - v0^2) = ke
 
First, K = 0.5mv^2 is not "average" kinetic energy- it is kinetic energy- in fact it is the definition of kinetic energy- there is no "derivation". At some time, back at the beginning of "physics" someone notice that, in many dynamics problems that quantity was conserved- so they gave it a name!
 
First, K = 0.5mv^2 is not "average" kinetic energy- it is kinetic energy- in fact it is the definition of kinetic energy- there is no "derivation". At some time, back at the beginning of "physics" someone notice that, in many dynamics problems that quantity was conserved- so they gave it a name!

Quantities, mv^2, 35mv^2, are also conserved!
 
Originally posted by PrudensOptimus


ΣWork = ΣF * d = mad = 0.5m(v^2 - v0^2) = ke

So ummmm ... This is relative kinetic energy not average kinetic energy?

That is, relative to the kinetic energy of the object when v0 = 0

Interesting derivation. Thanks.
 
energy is the ability to do work.

work is force times distance.

kinetic energy is that energy a body has due to its motion.

so let's see:

<br /> W=\int_A^B \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{s}<br />

but by Newton
<br /> \mathbf{F}=m\mathbf{a}<br />
so
<br /> W=\int_A^Bm\mathbf{a}\cdot d\mathbf{s} = m\int_{t_{A}}^{t_{B}}\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{v}dt\\<br /> = \frac{m}{2}\int_{t_{A}}^{t_{B}}\frac{d(v^2)}{dt}\! dt = \frac{1}{2}mv_B^2 - \frac{1}{2}mv_A^2<br />

so you see that the work done is equal to the change in kinetic energy between the two points, and this is a derivation of the formula for that kinetic energy.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top