How Is the Radius of a Star Determined from Its Density Profile?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Star
Poirot
Messages
87
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



P=Kρ^2 is a solution to the equation of the combination of the Hydrostatic Support equation and the mass continuity equation. Find the radius of the star.

Homework Equations


ρ(r) = (A / r) sin (root( 2πG/K) r)

The Attempt at a Solution


The first part of this was to prove first it was a solution which I have done fairly easily, however the last part about the radius has left me confused.
I figured the density at the surface (r=R) was equal to zero therefore:

0=(A / r) sin (root( 2πG/K) r)

And for the non trivial solution:

sin (root( 2πG/K) r)=0

so root(2πG/K) r)=nπ (for n integer)

However this would give a range of radii for the star which doesn't seem right.
Can you see what I've done wrong, thanks?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You get a position of zero density at root(2πG/K) r)=π. Do you expect matter outside this region? What would support it?
Is ρ(r) = (A / r) sin (root( 2πG/K) r) even valid outside that region?
 
What happens to the other solutions? Surely root(2πG/K) r)=2π etc is still valid? and the density should only hold for the star up to radius R, and no there wouldn't be matter outside the region.
mfb said:
You get a position of zero density at root(2πG/K) r)=π. Do you expect matter outside this region? What would support it?
Is ρ(r) = (A / r) sin (root( 2πG/K) r) even valid outside that region?
 
It is a mathematical solution, but the density profile is not described by a sine in that area any more. The density is zero after the function hits its first zero.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top