How Is the Radius of Curvature 8.68 mm Calculated for a Lens?

  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Radius
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the radius of curvature of a lens with a refractive index of 1.33, the focal length is given as 35 mm. The initial attempt using the formula R = 2f yields 70 mm, which is incorrect as it does not account for the refractive index. The lens-maker's equation was also applied, leading to a radius of 17.9 mm when assuming the second radius as zero, which was also incorrect. The correct approach involves using the formula F = n2 R / (n2 - n1) to find the radius of curvature. Ultimately, the radius of curvature calculated for the lens is 8.68 mm.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Parallel light in air enters a transparent medium of refractive index 1.33 and is focused 35 mm behind the surface. Calculate the radius of curvature of the surface of the medium

Homework Equations



f = \frac{R}{2}

\frac{1}{f}=(n-1) \left( \frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2} \right)

The Attempt at a Solution



The correct answer must be 8.68 mm, I can't see how they got this answer.

We know that the focus is 35 mm, so if we use the equation

R=2f=2 \times 35 = 70 \ mm

But this is not correct and it doesn't take into account the refractive index.

So, I also tried using the lens-maker's equation:

\frac{1}{35} = (1.33-1) \left( \frac{1}{R}- 0 \right) \implies R = 17.9

I wasn't sure what to use for the second radius so I used 0, and I didn't get the correct answer. So how can I get 8.68 mm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you understood the problem correctly. You have light in one medium entering another medium through a parabolic surface. Not sure the level of your class, but since it's posted in intro phys, I'll just give you the formula.

F=n_ 2 R/(n_2-n_1)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top