How Is the Spring Constant Calculated from Oscillation and Mass Changes?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the spring constant, the force exerted by the added mass and the displacement of the spring must be considered. The relevant equation is derived from Hooke's law, which states that the force (F) is proportional to the displacement (x), represented as F = kx. In this case, using the additional 40g mass and the 5 cm stretch, the calculation yields a spring constant (k) of approximately 7.84 N/m. It's noted that the linear approximation of the spring's behavior is valid as long as it does not undergo plastic deformation. Proper unit conversion is essential for accurate calculations.
ConstableZiM
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 100g object is suspended from a spring. When 40g are added, the spring stretches an additional 5.0cm. With the total mass of 140g, the spring is set into vertical oscillations with an amplitude of 10 cm. (a) What is the force constant of the spring?



Homework Equations


\sum F = 0 = -kx + mg



The Attempt at a Solution



From what I know, the force required to stretch a spring is not linear, so I am guessing that plugging just the 40 grams and the 5 cm into the equation won't work... What I got when I did that was k = 0.040kg * 9.8 / 0.05m = 7.84

Im guessing this is wrong?

Help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual assumption about springs is that the force exerted by them is indeed linear (as in #2 above). All your solution needs is units. (Not all information given in the problem is necessary to solve it.)
 
ConstableZiM said:
From what I know, the force required to stretch a spring is not linear, so I am guessing that plugging just the 40 grams and the 5 cm into the equation won't work...
Even for a real-world spring, as long as you don't stretch the spring so much that it plastically deforms or collapses onto itself, the relationship between force and stretching distance can be approximated quite well using Hooke's law, F = kx (some authors define it as F = -kx). Here F is directly proportional to x, so it is linear.
What I got when I did that was k = 0.040kg * 9.8 / 0.05m = 7.84
'Looks okay to me. :approve:

[Edit: SEngstrom beat me to the answer. And as SEngstrom says, don't forget your units. :smile:]
 
I love you guys ;,[
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top