How Is the Surface Temperature of the Earth Calculated?

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
This looks to be a fairly straightforward problem. I'm not sure why I'm having trouble.

The radiant energy flux density is the energy emission per unit area. Why would I not simply multiply the solar constant of the Earth times the surface area of the Earth? Of course, it would be a plane area approximation. Then, whatever that energy emission value that is, set it equal to the Stefan-Boltzmann constant*(TE)4*4pi*(RE)2?

Is the radiant energy flux density multiplied by the area equal to the power?

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20110318_204153.jpg?t=1300499036
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The cross section of the Earth you would use is not its surface area. It will be Pi*R^2. It is the area of the shadow that the Earth would cast on a plane perpendicular to the sun's intensity vectors.
 
AlexChandler said:
The cross section of the Earth you would use is not its surface area. It will be Pi*R^2. It is the area of the shadow that the Earth would cast on a plane perpendicular to the sun's intensity vectors.

Sorry, I was ambiguous. I meant plane area approximation, not surface area.

How do you calculate the radiant energy flux density at the Earth in terms of the Sun's temperature?
 
The manual has

JE = sigmaB*(TS)4*[(RS)/(DE)]2

I'm not quite sure why they multiplied it by the tangent squared.
 
Why did they multiply it by [(RS)/(DE)]2?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top