How Is Velocity Calculated in a Pulley System with Friction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of block A in a pulley system where block B moves up an incline, factoring in kinetic friction. The coefficient of friction is given as 0.05, and the displacement relationship between the two blocks is established as ΔsA = -0.5ΔsB. The user calculates the change in height and the force of friction acting on block A but struggles to integrate these forces into a cohesive solution. Key points include the need to account for gravitational potential energy changes and the tension in the string, which was initially overlooked. Ultimately, the approach should focus on energy conservation principles, considering both potential energy changes and friction losses to determine the final kinetic energy and velocity of the blocks.
Peter P.
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the velocity of the 60- block A if the two blocks are released from rest and the 40- block B moves 0.6 up the in cline. The coefficient of kinetic friction between both blocks and the inclined planes is = 0.05.

Here is the given diagram:
Prob.14-13.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


Since there is a pulley system, I began with the length equation so that i can determine the displacement of A with respect to B.

ΔsA = -0.5ΔsB
Once everything is plugged in, ΔsA = -0.3 (or just 0.3m down along its plane).
Using this, i calculated the change in height as it falls from the top to the next position. Δh = 0.2598076211 m. Then i calculated the normal force exerted by the plane and the force of friction acting on the block A (Ff = 14.715 N (directed towards the pulley system). So here's the part that i don't get. I am not sure how to tie everything together. I know that:
Kinetic Energy (T), Work and potential Energy (U)
T1 + U1 -> 2 = T2
0.5mAv12 + U1 -> 2 = 0.5mAv22

From the free body diagram of the isolated mass A, i know that there is a normal force, the weight of the block, and a friction force acting on it. So from this information, I believe that there should be gravitation potential energy (VG = mgΔh), and i feel like the friction force needs to be included as well. So i would integrate the force i calculated, with respect to s (∫Ff ds). Then i feel like it should be integrated from 0 -> 0.3. Is this correct so far?

Thanks in advance for any help.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter P. said:

Homework Statement


Determine the velocity of the 60- block A if the two blocks are released from rest and the 40- block B moves 0.6 up the in cline. The coefficient of kinetic friction between both blocks and the inclined planes is = 0.05.

Here is the given diagram:
Prob.14-13.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


Since there is a pulley system, I began with the length equation so that i can determine the displacement of A with respect to B.

ΔsA = -0.5ΔsB
Once everything is plugged in, ΔsA = -0.3 (or just 0.3m down along its plane).
Using this, i calculated the change in height as it falls from the top to the next position. Δh = 0.2598076211 m. Then i calculated the normal force exerted by the plane and the force of friction acting on the block A (Ff = 14.715 N (directed towards the pulley system). So here's the part that i don't get. I am not sure how to tie everything together. I know that:
Kinetic Energy (T), Work and potential Energy (U)
T1 + U1 -> 2 = T2
0.5mAv12 + U1 -> 2 = 0.5mAv22

From the free body diagram of the isolated mass A, i know that there is a normal force, the weight of the block, and a friction force acting on it. So from this information, I believe that there should be gravitation potential energy (VG = mgΔh), and i feel like the friction force needs to be included as well. So i would integrate the force i calculated, with respect to s (∫Ff ds). Then i feel like it should be integrated from 0 -> 0.3. Is this correct so far?

Thanks in advance for any help.

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly I have never seen Kinetic Energy given the symbol T ? That is usually reserved for Tension.

Secondly, when you looked at just body A, I didn't see any mention of the Tension force in the string??

EDIT: Thirdly, I wouldn't be integrating anything to solve this problem.
 
PeterO said:
Firstly I have never seen Kinetic Energy given the symbol T ? That is usually reserved for Tension.

Secondly, when you looked at just body A, I didn't see any mention of the Tension force in the string??

EDIT: Thirdly, I wouldn't be integrating anything to solve this problem.

Using T for the kinetic energy is the convention used by my professor and i agree that it was odd when i first saw it as well. Second, i completely forgot about the tension, which only confuses me ever so more in how i need to incorporate it into the equation. I am thinking it depends on mB.
 
Peter P. said:
Using T for the kinetic energy is the convention used by my professor and i agree that it was odd when i first saw it as well. Second, i completely forgot about the tension, which only confuses me ever so more in how i need to incorporate it into the equation. I am thinking it depends on mB.

Since you thread title is "Princilpe of Work and Energy" - I would be limiting my throghts to those "global" ideas rather than the nitty gritty of each mass.

You have already deduced the 2:1 ratio between movements of each mass.

I would work on:

Mass A goes down - loses Grav. Potential Energy
Mass B goes up - gains Grav. Potential Energy
Mass A slides its distance against its friction [ μN where N stands for Normal Reaction Force] losing some energy.
Mass B slides its distance against its friction, losing some more energy.

The potential energy gains&losses present a start for the final Kinetic Energy of the masses - but some of that is lost to friction on each block.
What is left should enable you to find v using (1/2)mv2, making sure you use the entire mass, as both will be moving since they are tied together.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top