How is Work and Energy Calculated in a Horizontal Table Setup?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating work and energy in a horizontal table setup involving a 1.5kg block subjected to friction. In part a, the work done by an external agent pushing the block through specified distances is calculated, resulting in a total of 5.51J. In part b, the work done is recalculated using the straight-line distance, yielding 4.109J. The conversation clarifies that friction is not a conservative force, as the work done varies depending on the path taken. The final conclusion emphasizes the non-conservative nature of friction based on the differing energy requirements for different movement paths.
Kudo Shinichi
Messages
104
Reaction score
1
HELP!Work and energy problem

Homework Statement


A block of mass 1.5kg rests on top of a horizontal table.
a)It is pushed in a straight line a distance of 1.0m in the x-direction, and then in a straight line a distance of 0.5m in the y-direction. If the block is at rest initially and at the end of the displacement, how much work was done by the external agent doing the pushing? The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the table is mu(k)=0.25
b)Calculate the work done by the external agent in pushing the block in a straight line from its initial to its final position. Compare with the answer in part a). Is friction a conservative force? explain

The Attempt at a Solution


a) Frictional force=mu(k) times normal force
=-0.25*1.5*9.8
=-3.675 (it is negative because it is the opposite to the applied force)
applied force is equal and opposite to the frictional force
work done in x-direction=3.675*1.0=3.675
work done in y-direction=3.675*05=1.8375
add both works together=5.51J

b) use Pythagorean theorem to find out the straight line, which is the hypotenuse in this case, which is 1.118
1.118*3.675=4.109J
Yes the friction is a conservative force, because we used the same force in part b as in part a and friction is just equal and opposite to the applied force
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Except for the final line about the conservative force, this is all right.

Friction is not a conservative force. We know this because for it to be conservative the work done on an object to move it from point "a" to point "b" will be the same regardless of the path it takes. However, you proved this to be incorrect for friction as it takes MORE energy to go the 1m up and 0.5m right, instead of the 1.118 diagonally.
 


christensen said:
Except for the final line about the conservative force, this is all right.

Friction is not a conservative force. We know this because for it to be conservative the work done on an object to move it from point "a" to point "b" will be the same regardless of the path it takes. However, you proved this to be incorrect for friction as it takes MORE energy to go the 1m up and 0.5m right, instead of the 1.118 diagonally.

thank you very much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top