How Is Work Calculated When Separating Charged Sheets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NullSpace0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
NullSpace0
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a current problem set question about the work per unit area required to separate infinite sheets of charge with equal and opposite charge densities from a separation of d to a separation of 2d.

Homework Equations


U=(1/8∏)∫E2dV
W=∫F*dr
E=4∏σ

The Attempt at a Solution


I was thinking I could just find the difference in energy stored in the field before and after... so I would integrate E2 over the initial and final volumes, and then the difference must come from work I have put into the system, which shows up as energy stored in the electric field.

If I do this, I get Ui=2∏σ2d and Uf=4∏σ2d

And so the work is just 2∏σ2d. But how am I sure that this has units work per area? It seems like work per volume because you have (esu^2)/(cm^3) for the units written out fully.

Is there a way to do this by integrating the force (or perhaps the field) rather than finding stored energy changes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember the potential energy of two charges is ##U = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r}## (in SI), so energy is charge2/length.
 
I believe the answer is correct.
 
What about the force method? Or any other method that's valid?
 
I actually don't know how to do any other method- ideas from other people?
 
I think you can argue that the force felt by a patch of area dA on one sheet is due solely to the electric field produced by the other sheet (E = 2∏σ). The force on the patch is then dq*E where dq = σdA. Since the force will be constant as you separate the plates, the work will just be F*d. I believe this will give you the same answer as the energy method.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top