How Long for a Glacier to Move 0.74 km?

  • Thread starter Thread starter licia589
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate how long it takes for a glacier moving at 41 nanometers per second to cover 0.74 kilometers, unit conversion is essential. First, convert kilometers to nanometers, knowing that 1 kilometer equals 1 billion nanometers. Next, determine the total number of seconds in a year, which is approximately 31.56 million seconds. After converting the distance and time units, divide the total distance in nanometers by the speed in nanometers per second to find the time in seconds, then convert that to years. This method will yield the correct time for the glacier's movement.
licia589
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
a glacier moves with a speed of 41 nm/s. how many years would it take for the glacier to move 0.74 km. answer in units of yr..

ok how do i solve this?

would i multiply 41
.74 and just convert it to yrs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you forgotten where the homework section is already?
 
This is just a matter of correcting the units.

Since the speed is given in nm/s (nanometers per second) but you are given a distance in km and asked for an answer in years.

You will need to know how many nanometers there are in a km. I don't happen to remember what a nanometer is so you will have to look that up (it will probably be given as so many nanometers per meter so you will still need to convert to kilometers.

You will also need to determine how many seconds there are in a year! That shouldn't be difficult: there are 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, 24 hours in a day and 365.25 hours in a year.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top