How Long Until a Pulsar Stops Rotating?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating how long it will take for a pulsar, specifically in the Crab nebula, to stop rotating given its current rotation period of 0.160 seconds and an increase in this period at a rate of 0.00000506 seconds per year. The user attempted to use the equation for angular motion but miscalculated the time, arriving at an implausibly short duration of about 1 year instead of the expected thousands. The conversation highlights the need to correctly identify the initial and final angular speeds when applying the formula to determine the total time until the pulsar ceases rotation. Clarification is sought on the appropriate angular speeds to use in the calculation. Accurate calculations are essential for understanding pulsar dynamics and their long-term behavior.
shadowice
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits radio pulses with precise synchronization, there being one such pulse for each rotation of the star. The period T of rotation is found by measuring the time between pulses. At present, the pulsar in the central region of the Crab nebula has a period of rotation of T = 0.16000000 s, and this is observed to be increasing at the rate of 0.00000506 s/y.

If its angular acceleration is constant, in how many years will the pulsar stop rotating?
already found
angular acel to be -3.935x10^-11 rad/s^2
wf = 39.269
wi = 39.2699

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Im stumped as to how to find this, i had initially tried to use wf = wi + angular accel*t thinking that the t i solved for would be the value i wanted.

i did 39.269 = 39.2699+ -3.935x10^-11t
that gave me 31559593.39 seconds then i did conversions to turn s into yrs which was that /60 s /60 min/24 hr/365d = 1.0007 yrs which is way to small it should be thousands of years shouldn't it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi shadowice,

shadowice said:

Homework Statement


A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits radio pulses with precise synchronization, there being one such pulse for each rotation of the star. The period T of rotation is found by measuring the time between pulses. At present, the pulsar in the central region of the Crab nebula has a period of rotation of T = 0.16000000 s, and this is observed to be increasing at the rate of 0.00000506 s/y.

If its angular acceleration is constant, in how many years will the pulsar stop rotating?
already found
angular acel to be -3.935x10^-11 rad/s^2
wf = 39.269
wi = 39.2699

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Im stumped as to how to find this, i had initially tried to use wf = wi + angular accel*t thinking that the t i solved for would be the value i wanted.

i did 39.269 = 39.2699+ -3.935x10^-11t
that gave me 31559593.39 seconds then i did conversions to turn s into yrs which was that /60 s /60 min/24 hr/365d = 1.0007 yrs which is way to small it should be thousands of years shouldn't it.

I have not checked all your numbers here, but your two angular speeds you have are the angular speed at the initial point (wi) and one year later (wf). So when you calculated the time, you got back the original time of one year.

So instead, if we want to calculate the time when the pulsar stops, what angular speeds would be used in the equation?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Back
Top