How many bright rings are produced in Newton's Rings experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter threewingedfury
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fringes Rings
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about Newton's Rings, participants analyze the number of bright rings produced in an experiment involving a lens with a radius of curvature of 5.0 m and a diameter of 17 mm, illuminated by light of wavelength 555 nm. Calculations using the formula m = r^2/(R*λ) - 0.5 yield varying results, with one participant arriving at 104 bright rings for air and 138 for water. Confusion arises regarding the correct values for radius and wavelength, as the book references different parameters leading to answers of 34 and 46 rings. Participants express uncertainty about their calculations and the discrepancies with the textbook answers. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately identifying the parameters in optical experiments.
threewingedfury
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Figure 35-46a shows a lens with radius of curvature R lying on a flat glass plate and illuminated from above by light with wavelength . Figure 35-46b, a photograph taken from above the lens, shows that circular interference fringes (called "Newton's rings") appear, associated with the variable thickness d of the air film between the lens and the plate. The radius of curvature R of the lens is 5.0 m and the lens diameter is 17 mm.

(a) How many bright rings are produced? Assume that = 555 nm.

(b) How many bright rings would be produced if the arrangment were immersed in water (n = 1.33)?



I used the equation: m=r^2/R*lambda - .5

Definetly not getting the right answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show more of your calculation?
 
Last edited:
m=r^2/R*lambda - .5

m=.017^2/(5*555*10^-9) - .5
m=104

m=(1.33).017^2/(5*555*10^-9) - .5
m=138

I've tried 103,104, and 105 for a

and done the same for b

but the method can't be right because in the book r=20mm, R=5m lambda=589nm and the answers are a. 34 and b. 46
 
17 mm is the diameter, not the radius.

but the method can't be right because in the book r=20mm, R=5m lambda=589nm

I don't understand, these are given in the answers?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top