How Many Parameters Define O(N) and SO(N) Groups?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the number of parameters that define the O(N) and SO(N) groups, concluding that it is \frac{N(N-1)}{2}. The reasoning involves starting with n^2 parameters and applying the constraint O^T O = 1, which introduces \frac{n(n+1)}{2} constraints. The determinant conditions for O(N) and SO(N) do not add further constraints, as the sign of the determinant does not affect the parameter count. Participants explore specific examples for N=2 and N=3 to illustrate the concept but seek a general proof for all N. Recommendations for books on Group Theory and Lie Algebras for physicists are also requested.
Norman
Messages
895
Reaction score
4
A little intro: This is for a whirlwind intro to Group Theory as part of another class (QFT) in which we are not proving anything, simply introducing definitions and theorems. We are not using a textbook, simply some notes the professor has written up for this intro and the notes are very incomplete. They also do not give any proof or explanation. So here is the problem:

Show that the number of group parameters for O(N) and SO(N) are \frac{N(N-1)}{2}

Does this make sense as the solution:

We have n^2 parameters. For O(N) we have the condition that O^T O = 1. This condition places \frac{n(n+1)}{2} constraints on the parameters. This leaves n^2 - \frac{n(n+1)}{2} = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}

Since O(N) has detO(N) = \pm 1 and SO(N) has detSO(N)=+1, simply picking the sign of the determinent doesn't force any additional constraint on the parameters.

I can only show this statement: "This condition places \frac{n(n+1)}{2} constraints on the parameters." for specific examples, like N=2 and 3. I can see how it is extended to higher orders, but I cannot prove it in the general case for N. Any ideas? Also, any good books on Group Theory and Lie Algebras for Physicists?
Thanks,
Ryan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The matrix equation O^T O = 1 gives n^2 scalar equations - one for each element of the identity matrix. By symmetry, the equations for the elements below the main diagonal are the same as the equations above the main diagonal, so the number of constraint equations is the the number of elements on the main diagonal, n, plus the number of elements above the main diagonal, say x. x equals the total number of elements in the matrix minus the number of elements on the diagonal, all divided by 2, i.e., x = (n^2 - n)/2.

Cosequently, the number of contraint equations is

n + x = n(n + 1)/2.

Another way to calculate this is using an arithmetic series. The number of constraint equation for the top row of the identity matrix is n. The number of constraint equations for the second row of the identity matrix is n - 1, the number of elements in this row starting with the main diagonal and moving right, etc. So the total number of constraint equations is

n + (n -1) + (n - 2) + ... + 2 + 1 = n(n + 1)/2.

Regards,
George
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top