How Many Pendulum Periods Minimize Time Uncertainty in Gravity Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nubey1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
To minimize time uncertainty in gravity calculations using a pendulum, the relationship between the uncertainties in length and time must be established. The length of the string has a precision of ±0.2, while the time of oscillation has a precision of ±0.1. The equation for calculating gravitational acceleration (g) incorporates these uncertainties, suggesting that the error in g can be expressed in terms of the errors in length and time. It is necessary to determine the number of periods to measure so that the time uncertainty is less than the length uncertainty. A deeper understanding of calculus may be required to analyze the contributions of these uncertainties effectively.
nubey1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The length of a string attached to a pendulum is measured with a precision of (+or-)0.2. The time of the oscillation is measured to a precision of (+or-)0.1. How many periods must you measure so that the contribution of the uncertainty in time is smaller than the uncertainty in length, when calculating g?

Homework Equations



T=2pi(l/g)^(1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution



g=((2pi)^2(l+delta:l))/(T+delta:T)^2
I don't know where to go from here.
Delta l and T are the error in those measurements.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nubey1 said:

Homework Statement



The length of a string attached to a pendulum is measured with a precision of (+or-)0.2. The time of the oscillation is measured to a precision of (+or-)0.1. How many periods must you measure so that the contribution of the uncertainty in time is smaller than the uncertainty in length, when calculating g?

Homework Equations



T=2pi(l/g)^(1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution



g=((2pi)^2(l+delta:l))/(T+delta:T)^2
I don't know where to go from here.
Delta l and T are the error in those measurements.

The next thing to do is assume that the error is really small relative to the actual value.
\delta l << l and \delta T << T. I think you might have an error in your equation for g:
g +\delta g= (2 \pi)^2 \frac{l+\delta l }{(T+\delta T)^2} where \delta g is the error in g.
If you are familiar with calculus then this comes out to:
\delta g = |\frac{\partial g}{\partial l}| \delta l + |\frac{\partial g}{\partial T}| \delta T
If you don't have the luxury of calculus we might need to know what relations for uncertainty you are given to clue you in
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
20K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top