How Many Photons Do a Light Bulb and Microwave Emit Per Second?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DieCommie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackbody Photons
AI Thread Summary
A 75 Watt light bulb emits photons at a wavelength of 500nm, while an 850 Watt microwave emits at a corrected wavelength of 150mm. To estimate the number of photons emitted per second, the relationship E = hν or E = c/λ can be used to calculate energy per photon from the given power. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the application of blackbody radiation equations and the importance of distance in power calculations. Ultimately, the significance of quantum effects in this context is considered negligible, as no quantized values appear in the calculations.
DieCommie
Messages
156
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a 75 Watt light bulb and an 850 Watt microwave. If the wavelengths of the radiation they emit are 500nm and 150nm, respectively, estimate teh number of photons they emit per second. Are teh quantum effects important in them?

Homework Equations


?

M(T) = \sigma T^4 Now this gives me the watts per meter^2. But I don't know the meter^2. (This doesn't make sense to me because the watts/meter^2 should be a function of the distance, farther out --> less watts/meter^2, but this function says nothing of distance...)

The Attempt at a Solution


Dont know where to start!

edit- My thoughts are I need to get teh Joules per second emitted from the object. I can then turn this into photons per second using the relationship E = h\nu

Thx for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second thoughts are correct, you don't need to consider the blackbody (which the microwave isn't). Just use E=hv , or E = c/lambda to get the energy per photon then the power you have been given.
ps I think you have misread the wavelength for the microwave it should probably be a few cm, 150nm is UV.
 
Yes you are right, the microwave is 150 mm.

Now I have the answers in photons/second. The question "Are the quantum effects important in them?". I have to figure out if the quantized nature of the radiation is significant. hmm... I am thinking its no, but I have no reason for that. I don't see and quantized values in the equations I wrote...
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top