How many W mesons required for D+ decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter genloz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mesons
genloz
Messages
72
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The decay
D^{+} \rightarrow D^{0} \pi^{+}
is not possible via a weak interaction which involves one virtual W+ meson. How many virtual W mesons are required?

Homework Equations


D0 has quark content c-ubar
Pi+ has quark content u-dbar
I'm not sure what D+ has...

The Attempt at a Solution


Assuming D+ has c-dbar...
how do you determine whether a virtual meson is involved or not and how many? Is it energy based?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
thanks very much!
so D+ has c-dbar...
D+ = 1869MeV
D- = 1865MeV
pi+ = 139.6MeV

So that means both a W+ and a W- boson are required to keep the charge at +1 on both sides? And have energy greater than 139.6-5?
 
Even though you had more W bosons involved, i say that it violates energy.
 
okay, thanks... so a trick question? An even number of bosons would be required to conserve charge, but energy will never be conserved so it can't happen...
 
Hmm ONE W+ boson also conserve charge.

In each vertex, charge, lepton number etc are conserved.

imagine the following:
In the D+ , the W+ turns the d-bar quark to an u-bar quark, and latter decays into something.

The thing is that you have less mass on the RHS of the eq, W+ can decay into one pion + meson. so there is no problem besides energy.

I THINK that you have made a misstake, that it should be the D^x _S Meson instead, then you have more mass (maybe correct mass for it to be allowed energetically). I might be wrong, but that is one desperate way =)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top