How massive are the largest (dimensionally) particles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DennisG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
DennisG
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
how massive are the largest (dimensionally) particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you mean sub-atomic particles. One of the heavier ones are W+, W- and Z_0. These are vectorbosons and their mass is approx. 180,000 m_e (electron mass). Vectorboson are responsible for the electroweak forces.
 
Yes, sub-atomic or inter-stellar particles.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top